Affect in Social Thinking and Behavior
By Joseph P. Forgas. 2006
156 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/861e75aa3980a487293b52a79e0d5f8baddee21c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- M. Alicke
- B. Kuvaas
- Constantine Sedikides
- A. Richards
- A. Day
- Marcus Selart
- I. Blanchette
- Fiery Cushman
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Self-enhancement and self-protection: What they are and what they do (2009, background): “Interestingly, and perhaps ironically, the interplay between affective and cognitive responses has been one of the most researched topics in the whole social cognition enterprise (Forgas, 2001, 2006; Sedikides, 1995).”
- The influence of affect on higher level cognition: A review of research on interpretation, judgement, decision making and reasoning (2010, background): “According to network theories, affective states prime the representations of mood-congruent concepts (Bower, 1981; Forgas, 2001, 2006).”
- AFFECT, EMOTIONS AND SEX OFFENDING (2004, background): “…to the mechanisms suggested by sex offender researchers, it is also important to bear in mind that the effects of negative emotions on the cognitions and behaviours of the person have been a major area of investigation within experimental clinical psychology using normal populations (Forgas, 2001).”
- Effects of Attribute Framing on Cognitive Processing and Evaluation (2004, background): “Affect-cognition research points to a similar effect, arguing that affect infusion is greater when people engage in more extensive and elaborate thinking (e.g., Forgas, 2001).”
- Progress Toward Construct Validation of the Sports Mental Toughness Questionnaire (SMTQ) (2009, background): “Such persons feel engaged in, and feel they have influence over, whatever they are doing, deriving positive emotions from their involvement (see Forgas, 2006; Maddi, 2006).”