The Role of Anticipated Future Interaction, Self-Disclosure, and Perceived Success in Internet Dating

By Jennifer L. Gibbs, Nicole B. Ellison, Rebecca Heino. 2006

380 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/59f2db6c05075cefb31772d53d5f71c857d394d3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: Hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition (2007, background): “Asa cross-contextual model, the hyperpersonal framework has received support in a variety of settings, involving both dyads and groups, in educational, romantic, and group/leadership settings (e.g., Chester & Gwynne, 1998; Gibbs, Ellison, & Heino, 2006; Wickham & Walther, in press, resp.).”
The Facebook Paths to Happiness: Effects of the Number of Facebook Friends and Self-Presentation on Subjective Well-Being (2011, unknown): “22,23 How, then, will these two self-presentation strategies affect Facebook users’ SWB?”
Strategic misrepresentation in online dating: The effects of gender, self-monitoring, and personality traits (2010, background): “As previous research acknowledged (e.g., Ellison et al., 2006; Gibbs et al., 2006), online dating services often channel initial online relationships into FtF meetings.”
First Comes Love, Then Comes Google: An Investigation of Uncertainty Reduction Strategies and Self-Disclosure in Online Dating (2011, methodology): “In the online dating arena, due to salient concerns about misrepresentation (Gibbs et al., 2006) and frequent acts of deceptive self-presentation (Toma et al.”
I'm Going to Instagram It! An Analysis of Athlete Self-Presentation on Instagram (2015, background): “In early self-presentation research via computer-mediated forums, scholars explored dating sites (Ellison, Heino, & Gibbs, 2006; Gibbs et al., 2006; Toma & Hancock, 2010) and online community groups (Lampel & Bhalla, 2007; Schwammelin & Wodzicki, 2012).”
Giving too much social support: social overload on social networking sites (2015, background): “…nds that individual characteristics (Agarwal & Prasad, 1999; McAndrew & Jeong, 2012), prior behavior (Kim, 2009), and social relationship characteristics (Gibbs, 2006; Subrahmanyam et al, 2008) in ﬂ uence users ’ perceptions of SNS. Individual characteristics SST research identi ﬁ es age as an…”
The Relationship Between Body Image Concerns, Eating Disorders and Internet Use, Part II: An Integrated Theoretical Model (2016, background): “…on online dating sites frequently include minor deceptions regarding users’ physical attractiveness (Toma and Hancock 2010), and an analysis of these websites revealed that 86 % of participants thought that other users were likely to misrepresent their physical appearance (Gibbs et al. 2006).”
Precursors and Underlying Processes of Adolescents' Online Self-Disclosure: Developing and Testing an “Internet-Attribute-Perception” Model (2006, methodology): “The enhanced self-disclosure in CMC is often explained with Walther’s (1996) hyperpersonal communication theory (e.g., Gibbs, Ellison, & Heino, 2006; McKenna & Bargh, 2000; Peter & Valkenburg, 2006).”
The Effects of Cell Phone Usage Rules on Satisfaction in Romantic Relationships (2012, unknown): “Cell phones, along with other forms of computer-mediated communication (CMC), help partners maintain their ongoing relationships (Gibbs, Ellison, & Heino, 2006 ; Johnson, Haigh, Becker, Craig, & Wigley, 2008; Sidelinger et al, 2008 ; Walther & Parks, 2002 ).”
Men Are from Mars, Women Are from Venus? Examining Gender Differences in Self-Presentation on Social Networking Sites (2012, unknown): “Assuming that ftf stereotypes and behavioral expectations inﬂuence the way men and women fashion their proﬁles on SNS, 36–38 the reported study examined gender differences in underlying motives for using proﬁles, as well as with regard to speciﬁc self-presentation strategies.”