Strategic misrepresentation in online dating: The effects of gender, self-monitoring, and personality traits

By Jeffrey A. Hall, Namkee Park, Hayeon Song, Michael J. Cody. 2010

191 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Marketing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f4c51bc9a43819bb92c7b8714e2b718081a14e54

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Daria J. Kuss
2. Mark D. Griffiths
3. Gabriel Bonilla-Zorita
4. Jamal J. Al-Menayes
5. Halley M. Pontes
6. Zsolt Demetrovics
7. Joël Billieux
8. Xavier Carbonell

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Mark D. Griffiths
2. Daria J. Kuss
3. Casey A. Klofstad
4. P. Hatemi

In Marketing

1. Mark D. Griffiths
2. Daria J. Kuss
3. Casey A. Klofstad

Citations in the corpus

• Online Dating and Problematic Use: A Systematic Review (2020, background): “Personality Correlates Considering the association that exists between specific personality correlates and patterns of use, a total of seven studies (Blackhart et al. 2014; Chan 2017; Chin et al. 2019; Clemens et al. 2015; Hall et al. 2010; Peter and Valkenburg 2007; Sumter and Vandenbosch 2019) wer”
• The Dating Preferences of Liberals and Conservatives (2013, background): “As stated in the ''Data and Methods'' section, daters have incentives to misrepresent themselves in their profiles (Hall et al. 2010; Klofstad et al. 2011; Pawlowski and Dunbar 1999), which possibly leads to measurement error in our results.”