Empathy and tourism: Limits and possibilities

By H. Tucker. 2016

128 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Food Science, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/59eac3cf9ab331593c39c083ba366098d22270d3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

1. Evan J. Jordan
2. Girish Prayag
3. J. Nawijn
4. A. Biran

In Food Science

1. Evan J. Jordan
2. Girish Prayag
3. J. Nawijn
4. A. Biran

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Girish Prayag
2. Evan J. Jordan
3. J. Nawijn
4. A. Biran
5. Rebecca Pera
6. D. Dalli
7. G. Viglia
8. Laura Grazzini

Citations in the corpus

• Negative emotions in tourism: a meaningful analysis (2019, background): “In the last few years, there is a growing body of work on tourists’ emotions (e.g. Bosangit et al., 2015; Buda, 2015; Cohen, Prayag, & Moital, 2014; Palau-Saumell, Forgas-Coll, Sánchez-García, & Prats-Planagumà, 2013; Tucker, 2016).”
• Residents’ Cognitive Appraisals, Emotions, and Coping Strategies at Local Dark Tourism Sites (2021, background): “This supports the emotion turn in tourism studies described by Buda (2015) and Tucker (2016), where disaster-related dark tourism sites become a social space to reflect on self in relation to the dead, survivors, and the postquake community.”
• When empathy prevents negative reviewing behavior (2019, background): “Within the service context, empathy has also been referred to the “emotional capacity to put oneself into the shoes of another” (Tucker, 2016, p. 32).”