Social Hierarchy Maintenance and Assortment into Social Roles: A Social Dominance Perspective

By J. Sidanius, C. van Laar, Shana Levin, S. Sinclair. 2003

108 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/590c7e9a5cf145b929f85a36f5990d31214a2f01

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. Tom Tyler
2. H. Haley
3. J. Sidanius
4. David de Cremer
5. B. Bradford
6. John T. Jost
7. J. Jackson
8. Russell S. Cropanzano

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Tom Tyler
2. J. Sidanius
3. H. Haley
4. B. Bradford
5. David de Cremer
6. J. Jackson
7. Jacinta M. Gau
8. Jo-Anne Wemmers

Citations in the corpus

• Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. (2006, background): “Recent research suggests that this occurs both because people self-select into roles consistent with their ideologies (Sidanius et al. 2003) and because people are socialized by the institutions that they join (Sinclair et al. 1998).”
• Person-Organization Congruence and the Maintenance of Group-Based Social Hierarchy: A Social Dominance Perspective (2005, background): “…‘fit’ can be found even between college students—who commonly have very similar backgrounds and very indefinite sociopolitical attitudes—and the courses of study they pursue (e.g. Altemeyer, 1998; Guimond, 1999; Guimond, Palmer, & Bégin, 1989; Sidanius et al., 1991, 2003; van Laar et al., 1999).”
• Social Dominance Theory: Its Agenda and Method (2004, unknown): “toward group-based inequality ( see also Sidanius et al., 2003 ).”