Social Dominance Orientation and the Legitimization of Inequality Across Cultures

By Felicia Pratto, James H. Liu, Shana Levin, J. Sidanius, Margaret Shih, H. Bachrach, Peter V. Hegarty. 2000

285 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/58dc265a469e8b9b1c26842d2534b64fc94e7274

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Critical Consciousness and Career Development among Urban Youth. (2006, methodology): “Sociopolitical analysis Sociopolitical analysis was operationalized, in part, through inverse scores on the SDO measure of Pratto et al. (1994). The 14-item Likert-type SDO measure contains items such as “Some groups of people are simply inferior to other groups.”
Understanding Women's Risk for HIV Infection Using Social Dominance Theory and the Four Bases of Gendered Power (2010, background): “In the United States, a woman’s history of child abuse has been found to predict greater sexual risktaking as an adult (Allers & Benjack, 1991; Scott, Gilliam, & Braxton, 2005).”
Social Dominance in Context and in Individuals (2013, background): “The present findings confirm that people in group dominance societies develop general orientations toward hierarchies that influence their relations to a variety of kinds of groups (see also Pratto et al., 2000).”
Social Dominance Theory: Its Agenda and Method (2004, unknown): “Sidanius, Rabinowitz, & Federico, 1998; Pratto et al., 1994; Pratto et al., 2000; Sidanius, Levin, Liu, & Pratto, 2000; Sidanius & Pratto, 1999).”
The Racial and Economic Context of Trump Support (2018, methodology): “This pattern held while controlling for individual dispositions, such as SDO (Ho et al., 2015; Pratto et al., 2000) and political conservatism (Jost, Glaser, Kruglanski, & Sulloway, 2003), making it unlikely that the link between racial diversity and threat reflects ideological sorting processes (e.”
Harassment Based on Sex: Protecting Social Status in the Context of Gender Hierarchy (2007, background): “Consistent with selfinterest, men are more likely than women to support attitudes that favor male dominance (e.g., Pratto et al., 2000; Sidanius, Pratto, & Bobo, 1994; Twenge, 1997).”
Person-Organization Congruence and the Maintenance of Group-Based Social Hierarchy: A Social Dominance Perspective (2005, background): “Importantly, both the sex bias and the ‘racial’ bias are consistent with the idea of creating a ‘match’ between anti-egalitarian attitudes and type of position (HE or HA) since men have reliably higher average levels of social dominance orientation than do women (Pratto et al., 2000; Sidanius, Levin”