How Reliable Are Our Assessment Data?: A Comparison of the Reliability of Data Produced in Graded and Un-Graded Conditions

By Anthony R. Napoli, Lanette A. Raymond. 2004

60 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/582c5385a73328c3e89247475d9faa56d394ba72

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. Bridgid M. Finn
2. J. S. Cole
3. S. Osterlind

Citations in the corpus

• Measuring Motivation in Low-Stakes Assessments (2015, background): “Napoli and Raymond (2004) similarly found that whether the exam would be graded or not graded influenced test performance.”
• Investigating Differences Between Low- and High-Stakes Test Performance on a General Education Exam (2008, background): “Th is is in stark contrast to the recent study by Napoli and Raymond (2004), who report low reliability for data produced under a no-consequence condition. Two important distinctions should be made regarding the diff erences between our results and those of Napoli and Raymond (2004). First our data ”