Straight Allies: What Predicts Heterosexuals' Alliance With the LGBT Community?1

By Adam W. Fingerhut. 2011

168 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5704633e45e62afa3e5904c5caae8ce7d6f75d99

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Miles Hewstone
2. Linda R. Tropp
3. T. Pettigrew

In Social Psychology

1. Miles Hewstone
2. T. Pettigrew
3. Linda R. Tropp
4. F. Barlow
5. Pirathat Techakesari
6. H. Selvanathan
7. Rhiannon N. Turner
8. Lindsey Cameron

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Miles Hewstone
2. T. Pettigrew
3. Linda R. Tropp
4. F. Barlow
5. Pirathat Techakesari
6. Rhiannon N. Turner
7. H. Selvanathan
8. Lindsey Cameron

Citations in the corpus

• Whites for racial justice: How contact with Black Americans predicts support for collective action among White Americans (2018, background): “…group members’ contact with disadvantaged groups can enhance their willingness to engage in collective action to benefit the disadvantaged group (Fingerhut, 2011; Reimer et al., 2017); indeed, both Fingerhut (2011) and Reimer et al. (2017) found evidence that contact between heterosexuals and…”
• The Single Factor Fallacy: Implications of Missing Critical Variables from an Analysis of Intergroup Contact Theory1 (2017, background): “Cakal, Hewstone, Schwär, and Heath (2011) showed that white South Africans’ positive contact was associated with support for black South Africans’ cause; and Fingerhut (2011) found that positive contact often motivates heterosexual allies’ involvement in the LGBT movement.”