Does the Franchisor Provide Value to Franchisees? Past, Current, and Future Value Assessments of Two Franchisee Types
By Marko Grünhagen, Michael Dorsch. 2003
173 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/568408be5b2bf16ae03360c90214cff5892d0abb
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Strategy and Management
Citations in the corpus
- Entrepreneurial Failure: The Case of Franchisees* (2008, background): “Such a finding greatly strengthens the claim that franchisors add value for franchisees (cf., Grunhagen and Dorsch 2003) and might receive more prominence in franchisor marketing and promotional efforts.”
- An Empirical Analysis of Franchisee Value-in-Use, Investment Risk and Relational Satisfaction (2011, unknown): “…that disagreements arising from the allocation of advertising revenues, royalty payments and the size of initial franchise fees constitute the dominant causes of relational conflict and litigation in franchising arrangements (Grunhagen and Dorsch, 2003; Porter and Renforth 1998; Tomzack, 1994).”
- Entrepreneurs or Investors: Do Multi‐unit Franchisees Have Different Philosophical Orientations? (2005, background): “Further, prospective multi-unit franchisees of either orientation need to understand that the relationship with the franchisor may change over time beyond initial perceptions and expectations (Grünhagen and Dorsch 2003).”