Spatial determinants of productivity: analysis for the regions of Great Britain

By P. Rice, Tony Venables. 2004

400 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5648cc3e20b051604eda677574f0c0625226fcda

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Regional industrial structure and agglomeration economies: An analysis of productivity in three manufacturing industries (2012, result): “In Rice et al. (2006), switching to an instrumental variables model from ordinary least squares yields slightly larger coefficients and directionally similar results.”
Entrepreneurship and Market Size - The Case of Young College Graduates in Italy (2010, methodology): “In this section we deal with the potential endogeneity problem by instrumenting urbanization with pre-World War II population density (in 1921), similarly to Ciccone and Hall (1996), Rice et al. (2006), Combes et al. (2008) and Guiso and Schivardi (forthcoming).”
Regional convergence and growth in Europe: understanding patterns and determinants (2011, background): “expected to enjoy higher levels of agglomeration economies, higher levels of productivity and, as a result, better economic performance (Ciccone and Hall, 1996; Head and Mayer, 2003; Combes and Overman, 2004; Rice and Venables, 2004; Geppert et al., 2005).”
Sectoral Agglomeration Economies in a Panel of European Regions (2008, methodology): “Institutional (core) finance for the Centre has been provided through major grants from the Economic and Social Research Council, under which an ESRC Resource Centre operates within CEPR; the Esmée Fairbairn Charitable Trust; and the Bank of England.”
TESTING FOR CAUSALITY BETWEEN PRODUCTIVITY AND AGGLOMERATION ECONOMIES (2010, unknown): “Studies mentioned in Table 1 that use market potential type functions include Mion and Naticchioni (2005), Rice et al. (2006), and Combes et al. (2008a), Combes et al. (2008b).”
An empirical analytical framework for agglomeration economies (2008, background): “Henderson (2003), Ciccone and Hall (1996), Ciccone (2002), Rosenthal and Strange (2005) and Rice et al. (2006) .”
East European Cities — Patterns of Growth and Decline, 1960–2005 (2008, background): “There is mounting evidence that sheer population size and deep labour pools increase agglomeration economies and productivity (Rosenthal & Strange, 2004; Rice et al., 2006).”
Evaluating Urban Transport Improvements: Cost–Benefit Analysis in the Presence of Agglomeration and Income Taxation (2004, unknown): “Econometric work controlling additionally for skills finds very substantial productivity premia in London relative to the national average (see Rice and Venables 2004).”
A meta-analysis of estimates of urban agglomeration economies (2009, background): “…of population or population density to instrument present values of agglomeration economies (Ciccone and Hall, 1996; Mion and Naticchioni, 2005; Rice et al., 2006; Combes et al., 2008a; Combes et al., 2008b) and geographical instruments (Ciccone, 2002; Rosenthal and Strange, 2008; Combes et…”
Agglomeration and productivity: evidence from firm-level data (2011, background): “Examples of studies include Aberg (1973), Sveikauskas (1975), Segal (1976), Moomaw (1981), Ciccone and Hall (1996), Braunerhjelm and Borgman (2004), Rice et al. (2006) , and Brulhart and Mathys (2008).”
Do Public Transport Improvements Increase Agglomeration Economies? A Review of Literature and an Agenda for Research (2011, methodology): “As noted above, Rice et al. (2006) and Graham (2007a) did not investigate any redistribution of economic activity, instead defining “agglomeration” as accessibility to employment, and therefore, these studies investigated only the first type of agglomeration impact.”
Regional disparities in the European Union: Convergence and Agglomeration (2008, background): “About half the difference in aggregate income is the result of selection processes: High-income sectors, “white collar” activities and high skilled workers are disproportionately attracted to urban areas (Combes et al. 2004; Duranton and Puga 2004; Rice and Venables 2004).”
Agglomeration, accessibility and productivity: Evidence for large metropolitan areas in the US (2017, methodology): “Only a few studies allow for varying rates of decay with increased distance and overall they suggest a steep decay of agglomeration effects, although they can extend as far as the boundaries of labour markets (e.g. Di Addario and Patacchini, 2008; Rice et al., 2006; Rosenthal and Strange, 2008).”
Urbanization and economic growth: the arguments and evidence for Africa and Asia (2013, background): “(35) The study by Rice et al.(36) also measured the rate at which the gains from proximity diminish with distance from the core city. They found that the advantages are greatest within 40 minutes driving time 27. Economic Commission for africa (2012), Unleashing Africa’s Potential as a Pole of Growt”