Sectoral Agglomeration Economies in a Panel of European Regions

By Marius Brülhart, Nicole A. Mathys. 2008

296 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1318b4f123d5516ec2cb908aa03fb529e655be69

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Agglomeration and productivity: evidence from firm-level data (2011, background): “Examples of studies include Aberg (1973), Sveikauskas (1975), Segal (1976), Moomaw (1981), Ciccone and Hall (1996), Braunerhjelm and Borgman (2004), Rice et al. (2006), and Brulhart and Mathys (2008) .”
Multilevel Approaches and the Firm‐Agglomeration Ambiguity in Economic Growth Studies (2012, unknown): “…spatial circumstances give rise to agglomeration economies – external economies from which firms can benefit through co-location – that endogenously induce localized economic growth (Glaeser et al. 1992, Henderson et al. 1995, Combes 2000, Rosenthal and Strange 2003, Brülhart and Mathys 2008).”
Do Public Transport Improvements Increase Agglomeration Economies? A Review of Literature and an Agenda for Research (2011, background): “Notable exceptions include studies by Ciccone and Hall (1996), Ciccone (2002), Graham (2007a, 2007b) and Brülhart and Mathys (2008), where the whole economy or subsectors of both manufacturing and services were investigated. Almost all research has been done at the spatial scale of the region or hig”
Agglomeration, inequality and economic growth (2014, background): “18 Rather than including lagged levels and first differences, an alternative, but intrinsically equivalent, specification would be to include contemporaneous levels and lagged levels, as in Brülhart and Mathys (2008) estimating agglomeration effects on labour productivity for European regions.”
What is Different About Urbanization in Rich and Poor Countries? Cities in Brazil, China, India and the United States (2017, unknown): “We hope that future work will look at whether developing world settings also replicate other facts that appear to be true in the west, such as faster wage growth in cities (Glaeser and Maré, 2001; De la Roca and Puga, 2014) and rising agglomeration effects over time (Brülhart and Mathys, 2008).”
Productivity growth in the Old and New Europe: the role of agglomeration externalities (2013, unknown): “…productivity of 0.07 percentage points in an Old Europe region and of 0.03 in a New country one.21 These results are consistent with previous works at the sectoral level (Dekle, 2002 and Brülhart and Mathys, 2008) which, however, do not relate this outcome to differences in the development stage.”
TESTING FOR CAUSALITY BETWEEN PRODUCTIVITY AND AGGLOMERATION ECONOMIES (2010, unknown): “, 2006; Combes et al., 2008b). The relevant argument here is that the densities we observe today are determined by previous patterns of population concentration which are themselves uncorrelated with contemporaneous levels of productivity. Instruments based on contemporary data have also been used. ”