Beyond Bowling Together: SocioTechnical Capital

By Paul Resnick. 2001

459 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/563cc79ba650d2af56bfb6f1ef36355615416d74

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites (2007, background): “Social capital is an elastic term with a variety of definitions in multiple fields (Adler & Kwon, 2002), conceived of as both a cause and an effect (Resnick, 2001; Williams, 2006).”
Distinguishing technologies for social interaction: The perceived social affordances of communication channels scale (2017, background): “Anonymity , also referred to as identifiability, is the degree to which users feel their real names or true identities can be concealed in a channel regardless of how public or private their communication may be (Lea & Spears, 1991; Resnick, 2001; Rice & Steinfield, 1994).”
Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis (2008, background): “Resnick (2001) , for example, suggests that new forms of social capital and relationship building will occur in social network sites due to the way that technologies like distribution lists, photo directories, and search capabilities support online linkages with others.”
Facebook as a toolkit: A uses and gratification approach to unbundling feature use (2011, result): “Our approach to differentiating among features is consistent with scholarship that highlights the affordances of ICTs as a way to understand their use and impact (Resnick, 2001).”
Digital Literacy and Privacy Behavior Online (2013, background): “Information control is multifaceted in nature, requiring a combination of social and technical skills as intertwined in Internet uses (Marx, 2003; Resnick, 2002, for “sociotechnical” capital).”
Social media and citizen engagement: A meta-analytic review (2016, background): “…registration, provision of records of previous interactions and reputational (third-party) information, as well as the ability to search and traverse other people’s social networks, are all expected to have positive implications for interpersonal trust (Resnick, 2002; Walther et al., 2009).”
The Role of Social Networking Sites in Early Adolescents’ Social Lives (2016, background): “Online relationship can be supported by technologies (Resnick, 2001) which are available in SNSs, such as distribution lists, and search capabilities.”
A familiar face(book): profile elements as signals in an online social network (2007, background): “Connections between users in an online community may be important for facilitating other tasks of the group [17, 20], reducing misbehavior [8, 18], and building types of social capital [11, 19], among other potential benefits [31].”
Spatially Bounded Online Social Networks and Social Capital: The Role of Facebook (2006, background): “Since online relationships may be supported by technologies like recommender systems, distributions lists, photo directories and search capabilities (Resnick, 2001), it is possible that new forms of social capital and relationship building might occur in online sites like Facebook.”
Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning making: A research agenda for CSCL (2006, unknown): “For example, understanding the emergence of social and knowledge capital in a community of practice may require tracing out the evolution of relationships and the formation and spread of ideas in networks of individuals larger than the small group (Resnick, 2002; Wenger, McDermott & Snyder, 2002).”
The mechanics of trust: A framework for research and design (2005, background): “It allows actors to engage in exchanges that leave both parties better off; it reduces the cost of these transactions; and on a societal level, trust correlates positively with productivity, low crime and health (Resnick, 2002).”
Is There Social Capital in a Social Network Site?: Facebook Use and College Students' Life Satisfaction, Trust, and Participation (2009, methodology): “Social Trust A popular measure of social trust is Rosenberg’s (1956) Faith in People scale, which has been used with minor variations by major surveys, including the General Social Survey and the World Values Survey.”
A face(book) in the crowd: social Searching vs. social browsing (2006, background): “Participation in online social networks may support close, affective relationships as can be found in online medical support communities [9], or looser informal ties as are often found in email distributions lists [10].”
A Meta-Analysis of Social Networking Online and Social Capital (2016, background): “Indeed, SNS affordances such as distribution lists, photo directories, and search capabilities (Kietzmann et al., 2011; Resnick, 2002) may make it easy to reach out to strangers or distant acquaintances who may happen to be interested in some particular matter.”
On and Off the 'Net: Scales for Social Capital in an Online Era (2006, background): “Similarly, Resnick has noted that such cyclical patterns carried out through communications technology comprise ‘‘socio-technical capital’’ (2001).”
Where Everybody Knows Your (Screen) Name: Online Games as "Third Places" (2006, background): “Such patterns can occur online as well as offline (Resnick, 2001).”