Beyond Procedural Justice: A Dialogic Approach to Legitimacy in Criminal Justice

By A. Bottoms, J. Tankebe. 2012

1,005 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/563c32f1976c873c92870c8baf889bd01826e81c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Justice from within: The relations between a procedurally just organizational climate and police organizational efficiency, endorsement of democratic policing, and officer well-being. (2016, background): “When officers are confident in their authority, they feel that they are supposed to be in a position of authority and that the power they wield is normatively justified (Bottoms & Tankebe, 2012).”
Why do ‘the law’ comply? Procedural justice, group identification and officer motivation in police organizations (2014, background): “There is no reason to suggest that similar processes are not at work within organizations, especially ones such as the police, whose very existence relies on internal and external processes of legitimation (Bottoms and Tankebe, 2012).”
Sensitivity to the Ferguson Effect: The role of managerial organizational justice (2016, unknown): “Equally important is the possibility that, in response to both negative media attention and public discontent, the police have begun to question the confidence they have in their own moral authority, or self-legitimacy (see Bottoms & Tankebe, 2012).”
Procedural Justice and Police Legitimacy: A Test of Measurement and Structure (2013, methodology): “In short, the testing of hypotheses derived from the procedural justice model of police legitimacy has outpaced the development of sound measurement techniques (Bottoms & Tankebe, 2012).”
Procedural justice and police legitimacy: a systematic review of the research evidence (2013, background): “The importance of procedurally just ‘dialogue’ during frontline police–citizen encounters is highlighted most recently by Bottoms and Tankebe (2012): they argue that it is the dialogic character in policing that cultivates perceptions of legitimacy.”
A War on Cops? The Effects of Ferguson on the Number of U.S. Police Officers Murdered in the Line of Duty (2017, background): “With respect to the police, Nix and Wolfe (2015) found that reduced motivation as a result of negative publicity in the six months after Ferguson was associated with lower levels of officer selflegitimacy (i.e., the confidence they have in the authority vested in them; see Bottoms & Tankebe, 2012).”
Community Perceptions of Police Body-Worn Cameras (2017, background): “Tankebe (2013) and Bottoms and Tankebe (2012) distinguished procedural justice/fairness from effectiveness. Procedural justice/fairness is related to both the “quality of decision making” and “quality of treatment” (Tankebe, 2013, p. 111). The former involves assessment of police honesty, among othe”
Reoffending After Release (2016, background): “Although there are some new ideas on how to measure legitimacy (Bottoms & Tankebe, 2012), generally, legitimacy has been operationalized in two different ways (Tyler, 1990, 2003, 2009).”
The Impact of Procedurally-Just Policing on Citizen Perceptions of Police During Traffic Stops: The Adana Randomized Controlled Trial (2016, unknown): “Drawing on the work of Beetham (1991) and Coicaud (2002), Bottoms and Tankebe (2012) suggest effectiveness, distributive fairness, procedural fairness, and lawfulness as some of the likely main contents of the dimensions of police legitimacy in liberal democracies.”
The Salience of Social Contextual Factors in Appraisals of Police Interactions with Citizens: A Randomized Factorial Experiment (2014, background): “Drawing 123 on the work of Beetham (1991) and Coicaud (2002), Bottoms and Tankebe (2012) suggest effectiveness, distributive fairness, procedural fairness, and lawfulness as some of the likely main contents of the dimensions of police legitimacy in liberal democracies.”
PRISON OFFICER LEGITIMACY, THEIR EXERCISE OF POWER, AND INMATE RULE BREAKING* (2018, background): “Prison officer legitimacy involves legal authority assigned by the state in addition to inmates’ general perceptions of officers’ effectiveness and fairness (Bottoms and Tankebe, 2012; Tankebe, 2013).”
Legitimating Practices: Revisiting the Predicates of Police Legitimacy (2016, background): “On the other hand, we offer a richer account of the normatively salient aspects of policing to contribute to ongoing debates about the nature of legitimacy (Reisig et al. 2007; Bottoms and Tankebe 2012; Tyler and Jackson 2013, 2014; Gau, 2014; Johnson et al., 2014).”
Why Do People Comply with the Law? Legitimacy and the Influence of Legal Institutions (2012, background): “Legitimacy is the right to rule and the recognition by the ruled of that right (Sternberger 1968; Beetham 1991; Coicaud 2002; Tyler 2006a; Bottoms and Tankebe 2012).”
Trust in the Police (2015, background): “Scholars such as Tankebe (2013; see also Bottoms & Tankebe, 2012) and Jackson and colleagues (2012) have begun questioning Tyler’s (1990; see also Tyler & Huo, 2002) conceptualization of legitimacy.”