Why do ‘the law’ comply? Procedural justice, group identification and officer motivation in police organizations

182 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Justice from within: The relations between a procedurally just organizational climate and police organizational efficiency, endorsement of democratic policing, and officer well-being. (2016, background): “To the extent that internal procedural justice encourages officers to follow organizational rules (Bradford & Quinton, 2014; Bradford et al., 2014), a fair climate may actually exacerbate the problem if the department espouses strategies that create tension in the community (e.g., Fagan et al.,…”
Explaining officer compliance: The importance of procedural justice and trust inside a police organization (2015, methodology): “The failure to gain support among officers for initiatives announced by police leaders, and to ensure voluntary compliance of officers with the regulations of the organization, has raised questions about the quality of interaction and communication between supervisors and officers, and its impact on”
Sensitivity to the Ferguson Effect: The role of managerial organizational justice (2016, unknown): “…because extant research has demonstrated that officers with greater self-legitimacy are more committed to using procedural justice with citizens (Bradford & Quinton, 2014) and less reliant on physical force to gain compliance (Tankebe & Meško, 2015), while community partnerships are an…”