Personality disorders and relational disorders: A research agenda for addressing crucial gaps in DSM.
By M. First, C. Bell, B. Cuthbert, John H. Krystal, R. Malison, D. Offord, D. Reiss, M. Shea, T. Widiger, Wisner Kl. 2002
98 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/54c7b67351fc8df3ef5cafb288aeaea937bb62ad
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
Citations in the corpus
- Alternative dimensional models of personality disorder: finding a common ground. (2005, background): “…limitations of the categorical model of personality disorder classification are well recognized (Clark, Livesley, & Morey, 1997; Cloninger, 2000; First et al., 2002; Livesley, 2003; Rounsaville et al., 2002; Oldham & Skodol, 2000; Trull & Durrett, in press; Tyrer, 2001; Widiger & Samuel, in…”
- Categorical and dimensional models of personality disorder. (2005, background): “…l u se o nl y. CATEGORICAL AND DIMENSIONAL MODELS 369 fundamental biobehavioral dimensions of temperament and personality, that best account for the behavioral, neurobiological, genetic, and epidemiological data, and that show the best clinical utility and predictive validity (First et al. 2002).”