Categorical and dimensional models of personality disorder.

By Timothy Trull, C. Durrett. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 2005

608 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/08b440e4a0aceaad9d41aeadd5d7a304a1529d75

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Pathological narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder. (2010, background): “Analyses of the strengths and weaknesses of these approaches for classifying personality pathology are widespread and beyond the scope of the current review (e.g., Huprich & Bornstein 2007, Trull & Durrett 2005, Widiger & Mullins-Sweat 2005).”
Initial Construction of a Maladaptive Personality Trait Model and Inventory for DSM-5 (2011, methodology): “…f 2011 American Psychiatric Association ORIGINAL ARTICLE With regard to a personality trait model suitable for DSM-5, a variety of compelling models exist, instantiated in a corresponding variety of assessment instruments (for reviews, see Trull & Durrett, 2005 ; Clark, 2007).”
Maladaptive Personality at Work: Exploring the Darkness (2014, methodology): “Although the proposed trait model emerged in the context of pathology research, all individuals can be profiled on the underlying model (e.g., O’Connor, 2002; Saulsman & Page, 2004; Trull & Durrett, 2005).”
Interpersonal Dynamics in Personality and Personality Disorders (2018, background): “Each of these practical problems trace back to more fundamental issues: personality traits are not taxonic categories (Trull & Durrett, 2005) and DSM PDs do not align empirically with evidence-based models of personality structure and development (Krueger & Markon, 2014; Sharp et al., 2015; Wright,…”
Assessment and diagnosis of personality disorder: perennial issues and an emerging reconceptualization. (2007, background): “…a corner, as research findings have (a) led to new assessment approaches based on convincing evidence that the structure of PD is dimensional (Trull & Durrett 2005), (b) compelled researchers to think more deeply about the theoretical implications of PD comorbidity both within and between…”
Psychopathy as a clinical and empirical construct. (2008, background): “…two large-scale empirical studies (Livesley et al. 1998, Ullrich & Marneros 2007) and a comprehensive review of personality disorder research (Trull & Durrett 2005) all suggest that a unidimensional factor reflecting dissociality/psychopathy emerges when symptoms of all PDs are factor…”
The dark side of personality at work (2014, background): “Consequently, the categorical model resulted in measurements suffering from high comorbidity, low reliability, and artificial thresholds for diagnosis (Krueger et al., 2011b; Trull & Durrett, 2005).”
Plate tectonics in the classification of personality disorder: shifting to a dimensional model. (2007, background): “…functioning is a longstanding issue whose importance is increasing with the growing recognition of the limitations of the categorical model (Clark, 2005; Krueger, Markon, Patrick, & Iacono, 2005; Livesley, 2003; Trull & Durrett, 2005; Watson, 2005; Widiger & Clark, 2000; Widiger & Samuel, 2005a).”
Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. (2006, background): “Dimensional models of personality disorders suggest that they may be understood as extreme expressions of personality traits (Trull & Durrett 2005).”
A meta-analytic review of the relationships between the five-factor model and DSM-IV-TR personality disorders: a facet level analysis. (2008, methodology): “…have increasingly noted the limitations of this categorical system (Clark, 2005, 2007; Krueger, Markon, Patrick, & Iacono, 2005; Livesley, 2003; Trull & Durrett, 2005; Watson, 2005; Widiger & Samuel, 2005) and have suggested alternative dimensional models of personality disorder (Clark, Simms,…”