A Procedural Explanation of the Generation Effect for Simple and Difficult Multiplication Problems and Answers

By Danielle S. McNamara, A. Healy. 2000

55 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5408ed97a6c28cd57989111a09c77ce23d2508f5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Slava Kalyuga
2. John Sweller
3. Ouhao Chen
4. Fred Paas
5. Tamara van Gog
6. J. V. van Merriënboer
7. Anthony R. Artino Jr.
8. Günter Daniel Rey

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Slava Kalyuga
2. Ouhao Chen
3. John Sweller
4. Fred Paas
5. Tamara van Gog
6. J. V. van Merriënboer
7. Anthony R. Artino Jr.
8. Roxana Moreno

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Slava Kalyuga
2. John Sweller
3. Ouhao Chen
4. Fred Paas
5. Tamara van Gog
6. J. V. van Merriënboer
7. Alexander Renkl
8. Paul Ayres

Citations in the corpus

• The worked example effect, the generation effect, and element interactivity. (2015, methodology): “McNamara and Healy (2000) used arithmetic problem solving tasks with one group of undergraduate learners required to calculate the answers to multiplication problems whereas another group was presented the answers.”