Does network board capital matter? A study of innovative performance in strategic SME networks
By Joakim Wincent, Sergey Anokhin, Daniel Örtqvist. 2010
259 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/53e3835fcfbaf4522a050188cf068e8bf23f32ad
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
In Management of Technology and Innovation
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
Citations in the corpus
- Intellectual Capital, Innovation and Performance: a Systematic Review of the Literature (2012, background): “With respect to innovation outcome, the effect of network board capital (operationalized by education and personal networks) on the magnitude of the innovation outcome (i.e. radical versus incremental innovation) has also been the subject of recent empirical investigation (Wincent et al., 2010).”
- Does intellectual capital matter? High-performance work systems and bilateral innovative capabilities (2013, methodology): “We allowed for the correlation of incremental and radical innovative capabilities, as they were demonstrated to be linked to a large degree (Subramaniam and Youndt, 2005; Wincent et al., 2010).”
- Inter-organizational collaboration and SMEs’ innovation: A systematic review and future research directions (2020, background): “Prior findings demonstrate that network size negatively moderates the effect of relational capital and human capital for innovation performance because small networks have greater resource constraints (Wincent et al., 2010).”