Bad news indeed for Ryff’s six-factor model of well-being

By K. Springer, R. Hauser, J. Freese. 2006

146 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Health, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/53e271ad68c025a549fa0a8a2d72e09c307a807d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Alexandre J. S. Morin
2. David Litalien
3. D. McInerney
4. Herbert W. Marsh
5. Jean-Sebastien Boudrias
6. I. Madore
7. D. Vella‐Brodrick
8. Véronique Dagenais‐Desmarais

In Health

1. I. Madore
2. D. Vella‐Brodrick
3. Véronique Dagenais‐Desmarais
4. Alexandre J. S. Morin
5. Herbert W. Marsh
6. D. McInerney
7. K. Page
8. Jean-Sebastien Boudrias

In Social Psychology

1. Alexandre J. S. Morin
2. Herbert W. Marsh
3. D. McInerney
4. David Litalien
5. K. Page
6. D. Vella‐Brodrick
7. I. Madore
8. Véronique Dagenais‐Desmarais

Citations in the corpus

• The Working for Wellness Program: RCT of an Employee Well-Being Intervention (2012, background): “Although Ryff (1989) reported good internal consistency and test–retest validity for each of the sub-scales, some have questioned the reliability of the factor structure (e.g., Abbott et al. 2006; Springer and Hauser 2006; Springer et al. 2006) This was also a problem in the current study.”
• Investigating the Structural Validity of Ryff’s Psychological Well-Being Scales Across Two Samples (2009, unknown): “Springer & Hauser, 2006; Springer, Hauser, & Freese, 2006 ).”
• Complementary Variable- and Person-Centered Approaches to the Dimensionality of Psychometric Constructs: Application to Psychological Wellbeing at Work (2016, background): “A general factor of psychological wellbeing is therefore highly plausible (Springer et al. 2006).”