The Influence of Family Goals, Governance, and Resources on Firm Outcomes

By James J. Chrisman, Pramodita Sharma, Lloyd Steier, Jess H. Chua. 2013

215 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/53b2d72c55380f24f9886d91a6815827dd432acf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. James J. Chrisman
2. Thomas M. Zellweger
3. Alfredo De Massis
4. Jess H. Chua
5. Franz Willi Kellermanns
6. Danny Miller
7. W. Schulze
8. Lloyd Steier

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. James J. Chrisman
2. Thomas M. Zellweger
3. Jess H. Chua
4. Alfredo De Massis
5. Danny Miller
6. W. Schulze
7. Lloyd Steier
8. Jeroen Neckebrouck

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. James J. Chrisman
2. Thomas M. Zellweger
3. Alfredo De Massis
4. Jess H. Chua
5. Franz Willi Kellermanns
6. Danny Miller
7. W. Schulze
8. Lloyd Steier

Citations in the corpus

• Governance Mechanisms and Family Firms (2018, background): “Finally, the configuration approach is returning to popularity after years of relative somnolence (Chrisman et al., 2013; Misangyi, Greckhamer, Furnari, Fiss, Crilly, & Aguilera, 2017; Zhao, Fisher, Lounsbury, & Miller, 2017).”
• Are Family Firms Good Employers (2017, background): “A byproduct of perceived inequities in the supervision and compensation of nonfamily employees, along with discriminatory promotion practices, is adverse selection (Chrisman et al., 2013).”