Self and identity as memory
By J. Kihlstrom, Jennifer S. Beer, S. Klein. 2003
185 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/529f072bef32f9d7d204ece53e5cd4e47e73f8b3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Kevin N. Ochsner
- P. Lester
- P. D. Harms
- Fred Luthans
- John D. E. Gabrieli
- Elaine R. Robertson
- Jeffrey C. Cooper
- Jennifer S. Beer
Citations in the corpus
- Leadership efficacy: Review and future directions (2008, background): “This development occurs as leaders interpret and encode their life experiences into the social role structures contained in their self-concept as outlined earlier, and can later on selectively draw on those experiences and the skills they engendered to enhance their efficacy (Hannah and Luthans, 200”
- Toward a courageous mindset: The subjective act and experience of courage (2007, background): “Through experiences and learning, people acquire meta-knowledge about themselves that can be accessed in future performance situations, such as when faced with threat (Kihlstrom et al., 2003).”
- Moral leadership: Explicating the moral component of authentic leadership (2005, methodology): “Through the social learning processes outlined previously, leaders acquire meta-knowledge about themselves (such as ‘‘I know how to influence others to act morally’’) that is integrated into their self-concept (Kihlstrom et al., 2003).”
- The neural correlates of direct and reflected self-knowledge (2005, background): “Direct appraisals draw primarily upon semantic self-knowledge abstracted from previous experiences, although in some cases, self appraisals might draw upon episodic knowledge of specific life events (Kihlstrom et al., 2003; Klein et al., 1989, 1996; Markus, 1977; Tulving et al., 1988).”
- Moral Maturation and Moral Conation: A Capacity Approach to Explaining Moral Thought and Action (2011, unknown): “One criticism of Kohlberg’s stages of development has been the requirement for interviews and the subjectivity associated with interpretations and coding of participant responses. Furthermore, both Kohlberg’s interview and Rest et al.’s (1999) written scenario response technique in the DIT utilize s”