Designing jobs to do good: Dimensions and psychological consequences of prosocial job characteristics
By Adam M. Grant. 2008
107 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/51c0f4b6c0179d99ff5847a404e9a4f7c846e698
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- M. Bolino
- N. Bellé
- Adam M. Grant
- Sharon K. Parker
- S. Rothmann
- Kelebogile Revelation Felicity Mokgele
- Arnold B. Bakker
- J. B. Rodell
In Social Psychology
- N. Bellé
- M. Bolino
- Adam M. Grant
- Kelebogile Revelation Felicity Mokgele
- S. Rothmann
- Sharon K. Parker
- Sabine Sonnentag
- Arnold B. Bakker
Citations in the corpus
- The Bright Side of Being Prosocial at Work, and the Dark Side, Too: A Review and Agenda for Research on Other-Oriented Motives, Behavior, and Impact in Organizations (2016, methodology): “Grant and Mayer (2009) S1–S2 measures: Prosocial citizenship motives, using the four-item scale developed by Grant (2008a) S1: Prosocial citizenship motives and impression management motives interacted to determine interpersonal OCBs.”
- Leading with Meaning: Beneficiary Contact, Prosocial Impact, and the Performance Effects of Transformational Leadership (2012, methodology): “In turn, perceived prosocial impact is associated with higher effort, persistence, and job performance (Grant, 2008a; Grant et al., 2007), as focusing on meaningful consequences for others can encourage employees to continue working even when they find it unpleasant (De Dreu & Nauta, 2009; Meglino…”
- Leading to Make a Difference: A Field Experiment on the Performance Effects of Transformational Leadership, Perceived Social Impact, and Public Service Motivation (2014, methodology): “…Job experience Years of experience in the field of nursing Likert-type scales (0 = disagree strongly, 6 = agree strongly) λ Perceived prosocial impact (Grant 2008a) α = .83; ρ = .87; AVE = .68 − I am very conscious of the positive impact that my work has on others .79*** − I am very aware…”
- A structural model of student well-being (2014, background): “Individuals who perform challenging tasks experience more engagement (Grant, 2008).”