The Ideological-Conflict Hypothesis

By Mark J. Brandt, Christine Reyna, John R. Chambers, Jarret T. Crawford, Geoffrey Wetherell. 2014

324 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5212bd7a9031f7aa2901b9c3fa69b12a0c862661

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

1. J. Roozenbeek
2. John T. Jost
3. Costas Panagopoulos
4. S. van der Linden
5. M. Petersen

In Social Psychology

1. S. van der Linden
2. M. Petersen
3. J. Roozenbeek
4. John T. Jost
5. Costas Panagopoulos
6. Aaron C. Kay
7. H. Thórisdóttir
8. D. Bar-Tal

In Sociology and Political Science

1. S. van der Linden
2. J. Roozenbeek
3. M. Petersen
4. A. Bor
5. Peter Bjerregaard Vahlstrup
6. Anja Bechmann
7. John T. Jost
8. Costas Panagopoulos

Citations in the corpus

• Partisan Polarization Is the Primary Psychological Motivation behind Political Fake News Sharing on Twitter (2020, result): “This would dovetail with studies demonstrating that Democrats and Republicans are equally motivated by partisan goals (Brandt et al. 2014).”
• You are fake news: political bias in perceptions of fake news (2020, background): “Yet, because moral foundations are known to differ across the political spectrum, for any given issue, either a liberal or conservative bias could be magnified (Brandt et al., 2014; Crawford, 2012).”
• Ideological Asymmetries and the Essence of Political Psychology (2017, background): “Given that some claim that liberals and conservatives are equally “intolerant” of social groups that are assumed to be ideologically opposed to them (Brandt et al., 2014; Chambers et al., 2013; Crawford, 2012), it is worth noting that Democrats were indeed more likely than Republicans to describe Ch”