Stand and Deliver: Effects of Boston’s Charter High Schools on College Preparation, Entry, and Choice

229 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Demand for Effective Charter Schools (2018, unknown): “Angrist et al. (2013) show that variation in impacts across charter lotteries is unrelated to changes in peer quality resulting from lottery admission.”
Do Parents Value School Effectiveness? (2020, background): “As discussed in Angrist et al. (2016b), the combination of these restrictions can be viewed as a Hausman (1983)-style test comparing lottery-based instrumental variables (IV) and OLS value-added estimates.”
Interpreting Effect Sizes of Education Interventions (2020, background): “For example, studies of the effect of attending high-performing charter high schools in Boston using lottery admissions show large effects on contemporaneous achievement outcomes, more moderate effects on college-going outcomes, and very limited effects on college completion (Angrist et al., 2016; S”
External Validity in Fuzzy Regression Discontinuity Designs (2019, unknown): “See for example, Huber and Mellace (2015), Angrist et al. (2016), Battistin, De Nadai, and Vuri (2017), and Black et al. (2017).”
Free to Choose: Can School Choice Reduce Student Achievement? (2015, unknown): “Under standard regularity conditions, the 2SLS estimate of τy is a consistent estimate of the density function of Yi(1) for voucher lottery compliers evaluated at y (Angrist et al., 2016; Walters, 2014).”