The importance of being valid: Reliability and the process of construct validation.

By Oliver P. John, C. Soto. 2007

164 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/51274f4679da239ce90c98f8df287661c41e0760

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Mapping the Moral Domain (2011, background): “Internal consistency is important but so is comprehensive coverage of the various facets of the construct (the scale development work of Harrison Gough, 1979, 1984, is a good example of this balance; see also John & Soto, 2007).”
What Lies Beneath the Dark Triad Dirty Dozen: Varied Relations with the Big Five (2013, methodology): “By framing the DTDD aspects within the Big Five, it allows personalify researchers to better understand what each aspect is measuring (John & Soto, 2007).”
Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. (2008, methodology): “The sample consisted of 829 undergraduates at the University of California, Berkeley (see John & Soto, 2007; Soto & John, 2008) who completed the BFI, Saucier’s (1994) 40-item version of Goldberg’s (1992) TDA, as well as Costa and McCrae’s (1992) NEO-PI-R from which we scored both the 30 facets…”
Internal Consistency, Retest Reliability, and their Implications For Personality Scale Validity (2010, background): “John and Soto (2007) described coefficient alpha as a “misunderstood giant” (p.”
Adaptasi Bahasa dan Budaya Inventori Big Five (2012, background): “Keywords: Big Five Inventory, cultural translation, language, personality traits Akhir-akhir ini, 1 kategorisasi ciri ke- pribadian yang pertama kali dikemukakan oleh Goldberg (McCrae & Costa, 1996; dan John & Soto, 2007) semakin populer digunakan terutama untuk tujuan penelitian.”
Mapping the Connections between Politics and Morality: The Multiple Sociopolitical Orientations Involved in Moral Intuition (2013, background): “…the low estimates are partly a function of the MFQ’s design: the item clusters were developed with an eye to maximal coverage of each foundation’s construct domain, as opposed to maximization of internal consistency (Graham et al., 2011; for a general psychometric treatment, see John & Soto, 2007).”
Measuring Personality Constructs: The Advantages and Disadvantages of Self-Reports, Informant Reports and Behavioural Assessments (2008, background): “A number of other prominent names in the personality literature have suggested the need for multiple measures and construct validity (e.g. Funder, 1989; 2002; John & Soto, 2007; Pervin, 1999).”
Incurious Motives to Seek Information about Potential Threats (2010, unknown): “…for the IWRM-FR scale had wording that was somewhat redundant (i.e. ‘feel better’) the correlation between these two items (r¼ .36) indicated only modest overlap (John & Soto, 2007), suggesting that despite some similarity in content, these two items were interpreted differently by respondents.”
The dirty dozen: a concise measure of the dark triad. (2010, methodology): “Following recommendations by John and Soto (2007), we present item-level correlations and descriptive statistics in Table 7.”
An examination of patience and well-being (2012, background): “Considerable support of construct validity was garnered under John and Soto’s (2007) five forms of evidence.”
The Next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and Assessing a Hierarchical Model With 15 Facets to Enhance Bandwidth, Fidelity, and Predictive Power (2017, background): “For example, a narrow measure of a Big Five domain will tend to have greater overlap between its items (because these items will all assess closely related patterns of behavior), and therefore stronger interitem correlations and greater internal consistency reliability (John & Soto, 2007).”
Leading to Stimulate Employees' Ideas: A Quantitative Review of Leader–Member Exchange, Employee Voice, Creativity, and Innovative Behavior (2017, background): “This too is not unexpected since scales developed without sufficient care can easily be content deficient or contaminated (Cred e, Harms, Nierhorster, & Gaye-Valentine, 2012; John & Soto, 2007), especially for relatively complex constructs such as creativity and innovative behavior.”