INCREASED COMPETITIVE ABILITY OF AN INVASIVE TREE MAY BE LIMITED BY AN INVASIVE BEETLE

By E. Siemann, W. E. Rogers. 2003

113 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/50f37730578122a5996a6a18ea52bcc3fe50ada1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Resource allocation to defence and growth are driven by different responses to generalist and specialist herbivory in an invasive plant (2010, background): “…necessarily translate to increased resistance to generalists in Triadica, although generalists in other ranges have been found to cause higher damage to plants from invasive populations in common gardens (Siemann & Rogers 2003a) or to prefer them in choice feeding trials (Siemann & Rogers 2003b).”
The advantages and disadvantages of being introduced (2006, background): “There is now persuasive evidence that an Asian tree has evolved lower resistance to its Asian herbivores and greater ability to compete with plants in its new habitats in the U.S. ( Siemann and Rogers 2003 ).”
Constraints on the utilisation of the invasive Chinese tallow tree Sapium sebiferum by generalist native herbivores in coastal prairies (2004, background): “Under natural conditions, Sapium experiences extremely low levels of generalist herbivory both in absolute terms and relative to native tree seedlings (Siemann & Rogers, 2003a).”
Enhanced allelopathy and competitive ability of invasive plant Solidago canadensis in its introduced range (2013, background): “Why invasive plants are often more competitive in their introduced range than in their native range has been a central question in understanding plant invasive biology (Blossey and Nötzold 1995; Siemann and Rogers 2001; Siemann and Rogers 2003a; Wendy et al.”
Including species interactions in risk assessments for global change (2007, background): “Recent examples include (Mitchell & Power, 2003; Siemann & Rogers, 2003; Torchin et al., 2003).”
Changes in light and nitrogen availability under pioneer trees may indirectly facilitate tree invasions of grasslands (2003, background): “3 Nitrogen and light were manipulated in two factorial field experiments in grasslands in Texas, USA.”
Evidence for a combination of pre‐adapted traits and rapid adaptive change in the invasive plant Centaurea stoebe (2010, background): “Whilst increased growth and ⁄or reduced defence has commonly been detected in invasive conspecifics (Siemann & Rogers 2003a,b; Jakobs, Weber & Edwards 2004; Wolfe, Elzinga & Biere 2004; Agrawal et al. 2005; Blumenthal & Hufbauer 2007; Zou, Rogers & Siemann 2008a; Zou et al. 2008b; Abhilasha & Joshi…”
ENEMY RELEASE? AN EXPERIMENT WITH CONGENERIC PLANT PAIRS AND DIVERSE ABOVE- AND BELOWGROUND ENEMIES (2005, background): “2979 Key words: biotic resistance hypothesis; congeneric pairs; Darwin’s naturalization hypothesis; enemy escape; herbivory; insect diversity; invasion biology; phylogenetic approaches to community ecology; plant—insect interactions; plant—virus interactions; soil microbial feedback.”
Differences in morphological and physiological traits between native and invasive populations of Sapium sebiferum (2007, methodology): “This program is based on NIH Image that was used to calculate leaf area in our previous studies (Siemann & Rogers 2003a).”
Plant invasions: merging the concepts of species invasiveness and community invasibility (2006, background): “Many studies have found at least partial support for the ‘evolution of increased competitive ability’ (EICA) hypothesis which predicts that plants introduced into an environment that lacks their usual herbivores will experience selection favouring individuals that allocate less energy to defence and”
Phenotypic and genetic differentiation between native and introduced plant populations (2005, background): “The reversal of relative genotype success in Sapium sebiferum depending on whether herbivores from Asia ( native range ) were present or absent ( Siemann and Rogers 2003a ) , also suggests that the identity of species that interact with invasive plants is critical in determining the conditions…”
Rethinking the common garden in invasion research. (2009, background): “j Buschmann et al. (2006); Wolfe et al. (2007). k Siemann and Rogers (2003a) .”
Novel Weapons: Invasive Success and the Evolution of Increased Competitive Ability (2004, background): “…for the natural enemies hypothesis as an explanation of some successful exotic invasions (Wolfe 2002; Mitchell and Power 2003; Reinhart et al. 2003; Siemann and Rogers 2003; Callaway et al. 2004; DeWalt et al. 2004; Jakobs et al. 2004), but there are reasons to be hesitant about accepting enemy…”
Predicting novel herbivore–plant interactions (2013, background): “For example, the current North American populations of several invasive plants introduced over the last century have lower levels of constitutively expressed defenses than ancestral populations (Siemann and Rogers 2003, Beaton et al. 2011).”
Tree invasions: a comparative test of the dominant hypotheses and functional traits (2011, background): “…sp./resource level Siemann and Rogers (2003b) B, Ge, Gr, S Native sp/invasive range/disease resistance Invasive sp/invasive range/disease resistance Siemann and Rogers (2003c) Gr Invasive sp./native population seedlings Invasive sp./invasive population seedlings Siemann and Rogers (2003d) Gr,…”