The advantages and disadvantages of being introduced

By P. Alpert. Biological Invasions, 2006

165 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3c731d268bcdad5ad3e1d39cd656e2249033fa3b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Introduction history and species characteristics partly explain naturalization success of North American woody species in Europe (2009, unknown): “2003; Alpert 2006; Colautti et al .”
The role of eco-evolutionary experience in invasion success (2013, unknown): “Further examples are the hypotheses of ‘new associations’ (Hokkanen and Pimentel 1989, Mitchell et al. 2006), ‘naïve prey’ (Cox and Lima 2006), ‘missed mutualisms’ (Alpert 2006), ‘mutualist facilitation’ (Richardson et al. 2000), and ‘human commensals and imperialism’ (Jeschke and Strayer 2006).”
Resilience of fishes and invertebrates to prolonged drought in two California streams (2009, background): “Natural flow regimes tend to favor native species (Lytle and Poff 2004), but only if the invader differs ecologically from the native species (e.g. the ‘‘unlike [or unique] invader’’ hypothesis of invasion, Alpert 2006).”
The imbalance of nature: revisiting a Darwinian framework for invasion biology (2014, background): “, 2009), even for those studies that highlight the superior adaptations of some invaders (e.g. the ‘global competition hypothesis’; Alpert, 2006).”
Progress toward understanding the ecological impacts of nonnative species (2013, background): “18) Colonization pressure Alpert (2006), Lockwood et al. (2009) A higher rate of species introductions increases the probability of a nonnative species that has large impacts.”
The rat and the octopus: initial human colonization and the prehistoric introduction of domestic animals to Remote Oceania (2009, background): “Most of the propositions against which the taxa are evaluated are from (Alpert 2006, p. 1524; Table 1), and at this stage there is insufficient evidence to discriminate amongst taxa in relation to many of them.”
Benefits of hyperspectral remote sensing for tracking plant invasions (2011, background): “Human activities such as international trade and travel promote biological invasions by accidentally or deliberately dispersing species outside their native biogeographical ranges (Lockwood, 2005; Alpert, 2006).”
A Meta-Analysis of Local Adaptation in Plants (2008, background): “Fourthly, the observed maladaptation in small populations can be due to genetic drift linked to founder effects, especially if the founders of the small populations originate from contrasting environments [27].”
Reducing redundancy in invasion ecology by integrating hypotheses into a single theoretical framework (2009, background): “Alpert, 2006; Colautti et al. , 2006 Sampling SP + Like GC, but interspecific competition, rather than PP, drives invasion.”
Impact of three aquatic invasive species on native plants and macroinvertebrates in temperate ponds (2011, background): “Furthermore, H. ranunculoides, L. grandiflora and M. aquaticum may also support the ‘unlike invader’ hypothesis in freshwater ecosystems (Alpert et al. 2000; Alpert 2006 ).”