Students’ perceptions of the evaluation of college teaching
By Larry D. Crumbley, Byron K. Henry, S. H. Kratchman. 2001
116 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Education, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/50963e7988ec0cc07d73be97869a5d41781cdf93
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
In Education
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Student evaluation of courses: what predicts satisfaction? (2010, background): “A third source of bias concerns students attempting to punish their teachers for low grades (Crumbley, Henry, & Kratchman, 2001 ).”
- Is student evaluation of teaching worthwhile? An analytical framework for answering the question (2007, background): “Thus, Crumbley et al. (2001) found that students will punish their teachers via the SET for being asked embarrassing questions (i.e. questions for which the student has no answer), for being graded hard, for being given quizzes and for being given significant homework.”
- Students’ Perceptions of Characteristics of Effective College Teachers: A Validity Study of a Teaching Evaluation Form Using a Mixed-Methods Analysis (2007, unknown): “Specifically, using students’ perspectives as their data source, Crumbley, Henry, and Kratchman (2001) reported that undergraduate and graduate students (n = 530) identified the following instructor traits that were likely to affect positively students’ evaluations of their college instructor:…”
- A study of collaborative learning style and team learning performance (2005, unknown): “action-oriented learners, Crumbley et al. (2001)”
- A Study on Student Satisfaction in Pakistani Universities: The Case of Bahauddin Zakariya University, Pakistan (2011, methodology): “Student evaluation of teaching (SET) questionnaire is a control device used to measure teaching effectiveness as stated by concerned students (Crumbley et al. 2001).”