New tools for the analysis and validation of cryo-EM maps and atomic models

By Pavel V. Afonine, Bruno P. Klaholz, Nigel W. Moriarty, Billy K. Poon, O. Sobolev, T. C. Terwilliger, Paul D. Adams, Alexandre Urzhumtsev. 2018

691 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Recent advances in the field of electron cryo-microscopy (cryo-EM) have resulted in a rapidly increasing number of atomic models of bio-macromolecules solved using this technique and deposited in the Protein Data Bank and the Electron Microscopy Data Bank. Similar to macromolecular crystallography, validation tools for these models and maps are required. While some of these validation tools may be borrowed from crystallography, new methods specifically for cryo-EM validation are required. We discuss new computational methods and tools implemented in Phenix, including d99 to estimate resolution, phenix.auto_sharpen to improve maps, and phenix.mtriage to analyze cryo-EM maps. We suggest that cryo-EM half-maps and masks are deposited to facilitate evaluation and validation of cryo-EM derived atomic models and maps. We also present the application of these tools to deposited cryo-EM atomic models and maps.

Subfields: Condensed Matter Physics, Structural Biology, Surfaces, Coatings and Films

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Condensed Matter Physics

  1. T. Croll

In Structural Biology

  1. Maya Topf
  2. Agnel Praveen Joseph
  3. Thomas Mulvaney
  4. Tristan Cragnolini
  5. J. Beton
  6. Wah Chiu
  7. W. Burmeister
  8. E. Andersen

In Surfaces, Coatings and Films

  1. Agnel Praveen Joseph
  2. W. Burmeister
  3. J. Beton
  4. Maya Topf
  5. Tristan Cragnolini
  6. Thomas Mulvaney
  7. Manaz Kaleel
  8. Aaron Sweeney

Citations in the corpus