A higher-order model of ecological values and its relationship to personality

By M. Wiseman, Franz Xaver Bogner. 2003

251 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5005a4db805cb1f3a8e7590acd9fab7b62b1caab

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

The structure of environmental attitudes: A first- and second-order confirmatory factor analysis (2004, methodology): “…a significant correlation between their two secondary factors (Bogner & Wiseman, 2002, p. 229; Wiseman & Bogner, 2003, p. 789), but they presented the model as composed of two orthogonal dimensions, with this orthogonality treated as theoretically desirable (Wiseman & Bogner, 2003, p. 787).”
Teachers' conceptions of nature and environment in 16 countries (2009, unknown): “We aimed to test the 2-MEV model (Two Major Environmental Values Model, Wiseman and Bogner 2003), in which two principal value-based orientations, referred to as the Utilization and Preservation dimensions, reflect anthropocentric and ecocentric ecological concerns respectively (Thompson and Barton…”
The effect of eco-schools on children’s environmental values and behaviour (2013, background): “(Wiseman and Bogner 2003, 5) The factors’ orthogonality is that an individual’s position on one dimension is independent of that on the other.”
The 2-MEV Scale in the United States: A Measure of Children's Environmental Attitudes Based on the Theory of Ecological Attitude (2010, methodology): “On several occasions, Bogner and Wiseman (Bogner, 2004; Bogner & Wiseman, 2002a, 2004, 2006; Wiseman & Bogner, 2003) used the 2-MEV Scale in conjunction with the New Environmental Paradigm (NEP) scale (Dunlap & Van Liere, 1978, 1984) in order to investigate their relationship and as a cross-test…”
The effects of social desirability on self-reported environmental attitudes and ecological behaviour (2009, background): “Hartig et al. (2001), Schahn (2002) and Wiseman and Bogner (2003) found only marginally significant correlations between social desirability and both environmental attitude and ecological behaviour measures.”
Growing Up Green : Becoming an Agent of Care for the Natural World (2009, background): “…protection of nature because they believe in conserving nature for its own sake or because they believe that nature is meant to be of utility to humans and for this reason they need to be good stewards of the earth (Bogner & Wiseman, 1999; Wiseman & Bogner, 2003; see also Johnson & Manoli, 2008).”
Environmental Protection and Nature as Distinct Attitudinal Objects (2013, background): “…words, we consider whether environmental attitude (i.e., attitude toward environmental protection) and attitude toward nature represent the conceptual space that Bogner and Wiseman (1999, 2002; Wiseman & Bogner, 2003) tried to capture with self-interested utilization and unselfish preservation.”
On Corporate Social Responsibility, Sensemaking, and the Search for Meaningfulness Through Work (2019, background): “Others have used the term ecological values to also refer to one’s values pertaining to the conservation and protection of the natural environment (e.g., Wiseman & Bogner, 2003).”