The influence of subjects' personality traits on personal spatial zones in a human-robot interaction experiment
By M. Walters, Kerstin Dautenhahn, I. T. Boekhorst, Kheng Lee Koay, C. Kaouri, S. Woods, Chrystopher L. Nehaniv, David Lee, I. Werry. ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005., 2005
345 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Genetics, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4ff77b5d5a523772acd7e2dfcbe770cc7a7514da
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Rachid Alami
- Emrah Akin Sisbot
- Thierry Siméon
- Luis Felipe Marin-Urias
- Jodi L. Forlizzi
- Chrystopher L. Nehaniv
- Reid G. Simmons
- Kerstin Dautenhahn
In Genetics
In Social Psychology
- Rachid Alami
- Emrah Akin Sisbot
- Tatsuya Nomura
- Tomohiro Suzuki
- Takayuki Kanda
- Kiyotaka Kato
- Brian Scassellati
- M. Walters
Citations in the corpus
- The Benefits of Interactions with Physically Present Robots over Video-Displayed Agents (2011, background): “Humans also have different preferences for personal space with a robot based on the robot’s head orientation and the human’s personal characteristics, such as agreeability and neuroticism [22, 25].”
- Robotics and Autonomous Systems (2014, neutral): “For example, recently there has been provocative work on social and moral relationships [32–34]; mental models and shared grounds [35]; emotional interaction [36]; the concept of ‘‘personal space’’ [37]; and longterm social interaction [38,39] between a human and a robot.”
- How may I serve you?: a robot companion approaching a seated person in a helping context (2006, background): “A number of previous live HRI trials with human scaled PeopleBot robots have been carried out [6, 17, 19, 20].”
- Natural person-following behavior for social robots (2007, background): “As several studies have found, the appropriate distance may vary according to an individual’s personality traits [21, 6].”
- A Human Aware Mobile Robot Motion Planner (2007, background): “User studies on robot motion and approach direction with respect to humans [21] [5] provided us a number of properties and non-written rules/protocols [15] of human-robot or human-human interactions.”
- Prediction of Human Behavior in Human--Robot Interaction Using Psychological Scales for Anxiety and Negative Attitudes Toward Robots (2008, background): “Walters and coworkers experimentally investigated relations between human personality traits measured by questionnaires and such aspects of HRI as maximal allowable distances [7].”
- A Survey of Personality Computing (2014, neutral): “Furthermore, assistive technologies involving the use of robots or other types of artificial companions will benefit from synthetic personalities that will increase their acceptance, especially with people that are not familiar with technology [119].”