On the validity of the parabolic effective-mass approximation for the I-V calculation of silicon nanowire transistors

By Jing Wang, Anisur Rahman, Avik W. Ghosh, Gerhard Klimeck, Mark S. Lundstrom. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 2004

155 citations recorded by the source corpus.

This paper examines the validity of the widely used parabolic effective-mass approximation for computing the current-voltage (I-V) characteristics of silicon nanowire transistors (SNWTs). The energy dispersion relations for unrelaxed Si nanowires are first computed by using an sp/sup 3/d/sup 5/s/sup */ tight-binding (TB) model. A seminumerical ballistic field-effect transistor model is then adopted to evaluate the I-V characteristics of the (n-type) SNWTs based on both a TB dispersion relation and parabolic energy bands. In comparison with the TB approach, the parabolic effective-mass model with bulk effective-masses significantly overestimates SNWT threshold voltages when the wire width is <3 nm, and ON-currents when the wire width is <5 nm. By introducing two analytical equations with two tuning parameters, however, the effective-mass approximation can well reproduce the TB I-V results even at a /spl sim/1.36-nm wire width.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4f9761ddb5f2b4c60969f0b7ea6bcdb394e45ee8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

  1. Gerhard Klimeck
  2. Neophytos Neophytou
  3. Mark S. Lundstrom
  4. K. Rumpf
  5. P. Granitzer

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

  1. Gerhard Klimeck
  2. Neophytos Neophytou
  3. Mark S. Lundstrom
  4. Anisur Rahman
  5. Jing Guo
  6. Mathieu Luisier
  7. K. Rumpf
  8. P. Granitzer

Citations in the corpus