Outdoor adventure tourism: A Review of Research Approaches
By Karin Weber. 2001
356 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4f691ef7b1f530ec2acf4f0fcc10f0a66755f9f6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Social Psychology
- Muzaffer Uysal
- Hye-Lina Kim
- Eunju Woo
- Christine A. Vogt
- Paige P. Schneider
- Kurt Matzler
- Rita Faullant
- Joseph S. Chen
In Sociology and Political Science
- Muzaffer Uysal
- Hye-Lina Kim
- Eunju Woo
- N. Prebensen
- Kurt Matzler
- Joseph S. Chen
- Christine A. Vogt
- Paige P. Schneider
Citations in the corpus
- Experience value as a function of hedonic and utilitarian dominant services (2016, background): “Epistemic or novelty value is of extreme importance in experience-related consumption (Weber, 2001) and reflects consumers’ curiosity and the need to learn and to experience diversity within consumption (Sheth et al., 1991).”
- Motivation and Involvement as Antecedents of the Perceived Value of the Destination Experience (2013, methodology): “Perceived value was measured using scales developed by Williams and Soutar (2009), who mainly mirrored the work from Sweeney and Soutar (2001) and partially from Bello and Etzel (1985) and Weber (2001) with semantic scales of “to very little extent” (1) and “to a great extent” (7).”
- Experience value: antecedents and consequences (2014, methodology): “Epistemic or novelty is of extreme importance in experience-related consumption (Weber, 2001) and reflects consumers’ curiosity and the need to learn and to experience variety within consumption (Sheth et al.”
- Cocreation as Moderator between the Experience Value and Satisfaction Relationship (2016, methodology): “…value of winter tourism experience was measured using scales developed by Williams and Soutar (2009), who generally mirrored the work of Sweeney and Soutar (2001) and partially Bello and Etzel (1985) and Weber (2001) with semantic scales from 1 = “to very little extent” to 7 = “to a great extent.””
- Fear versus fascination: An exploration of emotional responses to natural threats (2005, neutral): “Consequently, pre-existing individual differences in coping skills and personality might give rise to considerable variation in outcomes of wilderness experience (cf. Weber, 2001).”
- Personality, basic emotions, and satisfaction: Primary emotions in the mountaineering experience (2011, background): “Mountaineering, a form of adventure tourism (Pomfret, 2006; Weber, 2001), is a highly-engaging consumption experience.”
- Stress and emotions at work: an adventure tourism guide's experiences. (2013, neutral): “Moreover, this investigation addressed the lack of longitudinal research on guide experiences, and calls to further integrate established psychological theory and experiential approaches in tourism research (e.g., Berno & Ward, 2005; Weber, 2008).”
- Applying the 3M Model of Personality and Motivation to Adventure Travelers (2012, background): “A dearth of literature has focused on cultural experiences as the main reason people seek adventure travel (Sung, Morrison, and O’Leary 1997; Weber 2001).”
- Classification of Adventure Travelers: Behavior, Decision Making, and Target Markets (2004, background): “Furthermore, understanding adventure travelers should be centered on distinct travel psychographics emphasizing specific needs, motivations, and expectations (Fluker and Turner 2000) or individuals’ subjective experiences and perceptions of adventure need (Weber 2001).”
- Risk taking in Extreme Sports: A phenomenological perspective (2010, background): “However, these theory-driven methodologies may reflect judgments that do not necessarily relate to participants’ lived experience (Brymer, 2005; Brymer & Oades, 2009; Celsi, Rose, & Leigh, 1993; Ogilvie, 1974; Weber, 2001; Willig, 2008).”