Network learning: An empirically derived model of learning by groups of organizations
By Louise Knight, A. Pye. 2005
153 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4efe5fa553001d8ad6fb35f1c102fab381fe2489
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Science and Operations Research
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Kaj Storbacka
- Amy Fish
- Suvi Nenonen
- Joerg Sydow
- A. Diduck
- Raphaella Prugsamatz
- Keith G. Provan
- Cristina Mele
Citations in the corpus
- Factors that influence organization learning sustainability in non‐profit organizations (2010, background): “Part of the learning they explained is derived from the fact that organizations have to learn to understand each others' differences Knight and Pye (2005)”
- A new perspective on market dynamics (2014, background): “This type of learning is often triggered by exogenous learning events, critical incidents or even crises (Argyris and Schön, 1978; Cope, 2003; Fiol and Lyles, 1985; Knight and Pye, 2005).”
- The Learning Dimension of Adaptive Capacity: Untangling the Multi-level Connections (2010, background): “I chose it because networks play an important and growing role in both business and public management, including government learning since organizational networks are part of the complex of entities and people involved in such learning ( Knight and Pye 2005; Levy 1994).”
- Interorganizational Networks at the Network Level: A Review of the Empirical Literature on Whole Networks (2007, background): “For instance, to what extent are proximate outcomes such as network learning (Knight & Pye, 2005) or network innovation (Powell et al., 2005) ultimately related to effectiveness?”