Popular support for institutionalised solidarity: a comparison between European welfare states

By Jos Gelissen. 2000

258 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4ef7b873ea2488c4a2a6171fce811c54a227fa8a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Systems of Distribution and a Sense of Equity: A Multilevel Analysis of Meritocratic Attitudes in Post-industrial Societies (2007, background): “Although it is important to control for the effects of the experience with a welfare state on attitudes (Kluegel and Miyano, 1995; Gelissen, 2000; Andreb and Heien, 2001; Arts and Gelissen, 2001; Svallfors, 2003), we focus on the fact that living in any type of traditional capitalist society…”
Public support for redistribution: what explains cross-national differences? (2010, background): “Often these regime comparisons did not control for other country features as a possible explanation for cross-national variation (Gelissen, 2000; Svallfors, 1997).”
Attitudes towards redistributive spending in an era of demographic ageing: the rival pressures from age and income in 14 OECD countries (2009, unknown): “2003; Matheson and Wearing, 1999; Gelissen, 2000; Blekesaune and Quadagno, 2003; Fraile and”
Welfare States And Dimensions Of Social Capital: Cross-national Comparisons Of Social Contacts In European Countries (2002, unknown): “As yet, there have been some studies considering the impacts of welfare state regimes on values (Gundelach 1994), attitudes on welfare arrangements (Bonoli 2000; Gelissen 2000; Gevers et al. 2000; Svallfors 1997), and attitudes to unemployment and the unemployed (Fridberg and Ploug 2000).”
Conditional Punishment: A Comparative Analysis of the Electoral Consequences of Welfare State Retrenchment in OECD Nations, 1980–2003 (2008, background): “One would still expect incumbent vote losses after social policy cuts, since we have strong evidence that a large share of citizens strongly support the welfare state (Arts and Gelissen 2001; Gelissen 2000; Roller 1995; Svallfors 1997).”
High-skilled outsiders? Labor market vulnerability, education and welfare state preferences (2015, background): “11 might thus expect post-materialists to be more supportive of the welfare state than materialists, a hypothesis for which Gelissen (2000) provides empirical evidence.”
Preferences or institutions? Work—family life opportunities in seven European countries (2007, background): “…has been devoted to evaluating the institutional/structural impact which regimes have upon individual opinions on welfare policies (e.g. Korpi, 1981; Papadakis and Bean, 1993; Svallfors, 1995; 1997; Gelissen, 2000; Arts and Gelissen, 2001; Blekesaune and Quadagno, 2003; Sjöberg, 2004; Esser, 2005).”