Public support for redistribution: what explains cross-national differences?

By Ursula Dallinger. 2010

229 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Public Administration

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/28776bfebebfc2012cdddbd397b1ac9d3f451c3e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Alexander W. Schmidt-Catran
2. J. Mijs
3. M. Jæger
4. J. Jordan

In Public Administration

1. Alexander W. Schmidt-Catran
2. M. Jæger
3. J. Mijs

Citations in the corpus

• The effect of macroeconomic and social conditions on the demand for redistribution: A pseudo panel approach (2013, methodology): “As a consequence, in a cross-national context the prediction from the M-R model is that, holding other factors constant, the demand for redistribution will be higher in societies with more income inequality and lower in societies with low income inequality (Dallinger, 2010; Finseraas, 2009).”
• The paradox of inequality: income inequality and belief in meritocracy go hand in hand (2019, background): “2 The question of citizens’ concerns about or consent to inequality is related, but both conceptually and empirically distinct from citizens’ preferences regarding income redistribution and how inequality ought to be addressed by government, which have been subject to rigorous research (Dallinger, 2”
• Economic inequality and public demand for redistribution: combining cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence (2016, methodology): “Dallinger (2010) uses cross-sectional individual-level data (ISSP 1999) and finds a positive effect of economic inequality (measured via the Gini index) when controlling for economic prosperity and social expenditure.”