Systems of Distribution and a Sense of Equity: A Multilevel Analysis of Meritocratic Attitudes in Post-industrial Societies

113 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The psychological consequences of income inequality (2017, background): “…Branscombe, & Kappen, 2003); and those who perceive that their status in society is higher are more likely to be comfortable with the inequality which they perceive has or will benefit them (e.g., Brown‐Iannuzzi et al., 2015; Kunovich & Slomczynski, 2007; White, Kenrick, Neal, & Neuberg, 2013).”
Muscularity and attractiveness as predictors of human egalitarianism (2011, unknown): “…example, higher-income and better-educated citizens tend to support governments that are more oriented towards competition as opposed to equality (Kunovich & Slomczynski, 2007; Ritzman & Tomaskovic-Devey, 1992), and members of ethnic majorities and higher-income individuals tend to approve of…”
Nominal comparability is not enough: (In-)equivalence of construct validity of cross-national measures of educational attainment in the European Social Survey (2010, background): “Following Blau and Duncan (1967), social researchers often resort to years of schooling (or measures derived thereof) as a proxy variable for educational attainment (e. g. Eikemo, Huisman, Bambra, and Kunst, 2008; Kunovich and Slomczynski, 2007; Treiman, Ganzeboom, and Rijken, 2003; Scheepers, Grote”