Shaping Chinese novice scientists' manuscripts for publication

By Yongyan Li, J. Flowerdew. 2007

160 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, General Health Professions, Literature and Literary Theory

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4edc7ebb9c292716f2ecf4ad0642d8c0c9818d68

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Tomoyuki Kawase
2. Andrew E. Walker
3. J. Flowerdew

In General Health Professions

1. Tomoyuki Kawase
2. Andrew E. Walker
3. Gulfidan Can
4. J. Flowerdew

In Literature and Literary Theory

1. Tomoyuki Kawase
2. Andrew E. Walker
3. Gulfidan Can
4. J. Flowerdew
5. Ken Hyland
6. B. Kwan

Citations in the corpus

• Metadiscourse in the introductions of PhD theses and research articles (2015, background): “…rare for such novices to have their article manuscripts rejected, even though these manuscripts usually go through extensive revising and editing before and after being submitted to the targeted journals (e.g., Burrough-Boenisch, 2003; Curry & Lillis, 2004; Flowerdew, 2000; Li & Flowerdew, 2007).”
• A Model for Doctoral Students’ Perceptions and Attitudes Toward Written Feedback for Academic Writing (2011, background): “(Caffarella and Barnett 2000), perceptions of formative assessment practices (Crossouard and Pryor 2009), writing processes and beliefs about writing (Lavelle and Bushrow 2007), opinions and experiences regarding different feedback sources (Li and Flowerdew 2007), and opinions about feedback in scho”
• Scholarly writers who use English as an Additional Language: What can Goffman's ''Stigma'' tell us? (2008, background): “Li and Flowerdew (2007) cite a number of studies which describe negative attitudes towards EAL writers.”