Complex Prospective Memory and Executive Control of Working Memory: A Process Model

By M. Kliegel, Mike Martin, Mark A. McDaniel, Gilles O. Einstein. 2002

285 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4e5c0da4add7af7ba84727c97c878136524357ab

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Caitlin E. V. Mahy
2. L. J. Moses
3. M. Kliegel
4. Mike Martin
5. S. Raskin
6. Mark A. McDaniel
7. Stephanie M. Carlson
8. Esther Rozendaal

Citations in the corpus

• Memory for Intentions Screening Test: Psychometric Properties and Clinical Evidence (2009, background): “In fact, most theories of ProM include a series of stages (Kliegal et al., 2002).”
• The involvement of executive functions in prospective memory performance of adults (2003, methodology): “…study, by using several prospective based, e.g., Einstein et al., 1995; Park, Hertzog, Kidder, Morrell, & Mayhorn, 1997; complex prospective memory, Kliegel et al., 2000, 2001, 2002) or tendencies for age-related differences are evident (event-based, cf. Cherry & LeCompte, 1999; Einstein et al.,…”
• The development of prospective memory in children: An executive framework (2014, background): “Further, more than 50% of the variance in adult performance on a complex prospective memory task was predicted by their executive abilities, particularly planning and cognitive flexibility (Kliegel et al., 2002).”