Performance of foreign subsidiaries: Does psychic distance matter?
By D. Dikova. 2009
198 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4e15ca2a1d76697f10d21d8abf60fe7cf4c943c3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
In Strategy and Management
Citations in the corpus
- Institutional Distance and Foreign Subsidiary Performance in Emerging Markets: Moderating Effects of Ownership Strategy and Host-Country Experience (2016, unknown): “2008) and among foreign subsidiaries in specific emerging market regions such as Central and Eastern Europe (Dikova 2009).”
- The Concept of Distance in International Business Research: A Review and Research Agenda (2016, unknown): “Other articles show that greater distance increases the comprehensiveness of market research and planning (Evans and Mavondo 2002) and, in turn, establishes a reliable basis for IB decisions involving distant countries (Dikova 2009).”
- The impact of increases in subsidiary autonomy and network relationships on performance (2012, background): “Other studies oriented towards subsidiary performance treat performance as an independent variable (Lovett, Pérez-Nordtvedt, & Rasheed, 2009) or focus on issues such as psychic distance (Dikova, 2009) or spillover effects (Duanmu & Fai, 2007; Giroud, 2007).”
- Added Psychic Distance Stimuli and MNE Performance: Performance Effects of Added Cultural, Governance, Geographic, and Economic Distance in MNEs' International Expansion (2014, unknown): “In addition, these dimensions have been widely used in the IB literature to capture the part of the governance environment (Dikova, 2009; Globerman and Shapiro, 2003; Håkanson and Ambos, 2010; Malhotra et al., 2009; Rao et al., 2005; Slangen and Beugelsdijk, 2010; Slangen and van Tulder, 2009).”