Stakeholder Theory, Value, and Firm Performance
By J. Harrison, A. Wicks. Business Ethics Quarterly, 2013
1,005 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management Information Systems, Safety Research, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4dabc40996afc3d802bc1ad70f2f010133feb19a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Information Systems
In Safety Research
In Strategy and Management
- Ante Glavas
- V. Soundararajan
- Ken Kelley
- Jill A. Brown
- Michael L. Barnett
- Herman Aguinis
- K. Maas
- Marc Orlitzky
Citations in the corpus
- Deconstructing the Way in which Value Is Created in the Context of Social Entrepreneurship (2018, neutral): “In this field, the notion of value has not been constricted to C© 2016 British Academy of Management and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. examining profitability and economic returns exclusively, which is normally the case with business literature (Harrison and Wicks 2013).”
- The Effects of Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility on Employee Attitudes (2014, background): “…stakeholder theory (Freeman, 1984; Wartick & Cochran, 1985; Wood, 1991; for a review see Laplume, Sonpar, & Litz, 2008; for a four-factor model see Harrison & Wicks, 2013), which extends the shareholder view of the firm to one that is also focused on the relationships with and responsibilities…”
- Voluntary Governance Mechanisms in Global Supply Chains: Beyond CSR to a Stakeholder Utility Perspective (2016, background): “Perceptions of failures in distributive justice, most closely aligned with economic factors, can be particularly disturbing to stakeholders' perceptions of the amount of utility that they see as favourable (Harrison and Wicks, 2013).”
- The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility (2018, background): “This stakeholder approach, or what is now generally deemed stakeholder theory, has “infiltrated the academic dialogue in management” (Harrison & Wicks, 2013, p. 97) and helped to spur legions of scholars as well as titans of industry to broadly discredit the shareholder model as “wrong,” “a…”