Green and Greenback
By A. Diekmann, Peter Preisendörfer. 2003
608 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4cd82f289e8f82bcd58f99bd85e4dccf7694d207
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
- L. Steg
- K. Keizer
- G. Perlaviciute
- Heesup Han
- J. Bolderdijk
- H. B. Truelove
- John Th⊘gersen
- Harm Alhusen
In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
In Sociology and Political Science
- L. Steg
- G. Perlaviciute
- Heesup Han
- K. Keizer
- H. B. Truelove
- J. Bolderdijk
- Siegwart Lindenberg
- R. Gifford
Citations in the corpus
- On the Determinants of Pro-Environmental Behavior: A Literature Review and Guide for the Empirical Economist (2019, background): “Giving up car use in favor of public transportation is found to involve “high costs”(Diekmann and Preisendörfer, 2003), even if public transportation is more environmentally friendly.”
- What explains public support for climate policies? A review of empirical and experimental studies (2016, background): “This builds on the so-called ‘low-cost hypothesis’, which predicts that environmental concern translates into low-cost pro-environmental behaviours, but only to a smaller extent into high-cost behaviours (Diekmann & Preisendörfer, 2003).”
- Energy saving in Swedish households. The (relative) importance of environmental attitudes (2011, background): “The willingness to change behaviour in line with policy intentions affecting households’ choice of energy behaviour might be higher among households with higher levels of trust in government and its institutions (Diekmann and Preisendörfer, 2003).”
- Positive and negative spillover of pro-environmental behavior: An integrative review and theoretical framework (2014, background): “Indeed, even among people who are concerned about the environment, the strength of that concern on environmental behaviors diminishes as behaviors become more difficult or costly (Diekmann and Preisendö rfer, 2003).”
- Varieties of Environmental Labelling, Market Structures, and Sustainable Consumption Across Europe: A Comparative Analysis of Organizational and Market Supply Determinants of Environmental-Labelled Goods (2011, background): “Especially pro-environmental and post-materialist value orientations are highly important for acting sustainably (Diekmann and Preisendörfer 2003; Inglehart 1995).”
- Intention to pay conventional-hotel prices at a green hotel – a modification of the theory of planned behavior (2010, background): “…of price, will not be always prepared to accept continuous inconveniences, and still want to sustain their existing lifestyle, although they simultaneously want to be ecologically responsible (Dalton et al., 2008; Diekmann & Preisendorfer, 2003; Manaktola & Jauhari, 2007; Schwartz, 1990).”
- The Motivational Roots of Norms for Environmentally Responsible Behavior (2009, background): “Recycling is usually classified as a “low cost” and buying organic food as a “medium-to-high cost” behavior (Diekmann & Preisendorfer, 2003 ; Kaiser & Schultz, 2009 ; Schultz & Oskamp, 1996 ).”
- An Integrated Framework for Encouraging Pro-environmental Behaviour: The role of values, situational factors and goals (2014, background): “Apparently, people are less likely to act upon normative considerations when the relevant behaviour is associated with relatively high costs (the low cost hypothesis, see Diekmann & Preisendörfer, 2003), as such actions are likely to seriously threaten other values they endorse.”