A Meta-analysis of Board Leadership Structure and Financial Performance: are "two heads better than one"?

By Dawna L. Rhoades, Paula L. Rechner, C. Sundaramurthy. 2001

199 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4c9e36621ee7d8bed1ee3894944cd32375479524

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

Citations in the corpus

Corporate Governance and Tobin’s Q as a Measure of Organizational Performance (2018, unknown): “…moderating or mediating variables (such as ownership concentration, firm age, firm size, foreign ownership, etc.) on OP (Coles and Hasterly, 2000; Rhoades et al., 2001; Kouki and Guizani, 2015; Guizani, 2013), a lacuna that many scholars have urged academics to investigate (Finkelstein and…”
Board Characteristics and Firm Performance: Evidence from New Zealand (2011, unknown): “Third, the study found that board size has a moderating effect on other board characteristics providing support to the contingency view regarding the context (e.g., Boyd, 1995; Finkelstein & D’Aveni, 1994; Rhoades et al., 2001).”
Board Characteristics and Firm Performance: Case of Saudi Arabia (2012, background): “…performance is related to good CG (Baysinger& Butler,1985; Brickley&James, 1987; Rechner& Dalton, 1991; Byrd &Hickman, 1992; Brickley et al, 1994; Rhoades et al, 2001; Coles &Jarrell, 2001; Haniffa&Hudaib, 2006) and some other studies found a negative relationship between CG and firm performance…”
Audit Committee, Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence from India (2016, background): “…duality, promoter shareholding) have been found to have some impact on the financial performance of a firm which has been measured based on return on assets, return on equity and Tobin‘s q in various research papers (Ibrahim & Samad, 2014; Kiel & Nicholson 2003; and Rhoades et al., 2001).”
Corporate Governance and Earnings Management: A Meta‐Analysis (2009, methodology): “We use the meta-analytic technique developed by Hunter and Schmidt (Hunter & Schmidt, 1990; Hunter, Schmidt, & Jackson, 1982), which is commonly used in economics and in other studies on corporate governance (Dalton et al., 1998, 1999, 2003; Rhoades et al., 2000, 2001).”
THE EFFECT OF ROLE DUALITY ON CORPORATE PERFORMANCE IN MALAYSIA (2005, methodology): “Rhoades et al. (2001) examine the relationship between board leadership structure using dummy variable 48 and organisational performance 49 found a significant relationship between CEO role duality and firm performance.”
Ownership structure, corporate governance and corporate performance in Malaysia (2010, background): “The argument against role duality stems from the notion that directors are entrusted with monitoring and evaluating the actions of top management, combining the roles would mean evaluating own performance ( Rhoades et al. , 2001”
The Association of Board Independence and Ownership Concentration with Voluntary Disclosure: A Meta-analysis (2010, methodology): “, 1982; Hunter and Schmidt, 1990), which is commonly used in economics and in other studies on corporate governance (Dalton et al., 1998, 1999, 2003; Rhoades et al., 2001).”