Importance and threat as determining factors for criticality of natural capital

By R.W.J. de Groot, J. Perk, A. Chiesura, A. V. Vliet. 2003

206 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4c98d65037fb11308329aebd6bdafe85027f6968

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. M. Wackernagel
2. Daniel Moran
3. F. Brand
4. Ken Wallace
5. Justin Kitzes
6. Manfred Lenzen
7. E. Dietzenbacher

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Daniel Moran
2. F. Brand
3. Ken Wallace
4. R. Turner
5. B. Fisher

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. Daniel Moran
2. M. Wackernagel
3. F. Brand
4. Ken Wallace
5. R. Turner
6. B. Fisher

Citations in the corpus

• National Footprint and Biocapacity Accounts 2005: The underlying calculation method (2005, background): “Assessments of the importance of and threats to natural capital can help identify those critical elements (De Groot et al., 2003).”
• Weak and strong sustainability in the SEEA: concepts and measurement (2007, unknown): “Thus classifying CNC will require a mixture of ecological, economic and social criteria (see De Groot et al., 2003 ) and will depend on spatial scale.”
• Establishing national natural capital accounts based on detailed Ecological Footprint and biological capacity assessments (2004, background): “Assessments of the importance of and threats to natural capital can help identify those critical elements (De Groot et al., 2003).”
• Classification of ecosystem services: Problems and solutions (2007, methodology): “Both terms are also synonymous with ‘natural capital’ as defined by De Groot et al. (2003).”
• Critical natural capital revisited: Ecological resilience and sustainable development (2009, methodology): “Bengtsson et al., 2003; Bellwoodetal.,2003;Nystrom,2006),probabilisticresilienceand percolationtheory(Peterson,2002)ortheconceptofmaintained systemidentity(Cummingetal.,2005).Theconceptofecological resiliencemaybeusedcomplementarytootherapproachesthat mirror the degree of threat ecosystems face, suc”
• Is Corruption Bad for Environmental Sustainability? A Cross-National Analysis. (2006, unknown): “The approach can be applied at local, national (Deutsch et al. 2003, Ekins and Simon 2003), regional (De Groot et al. 2003), and global scales.”