National Footprint and Biocapacity Accounts 2005: The underlying calculation method
By M. Wackernagel, C. Monfreda, Daniel Moran, P. Wermer, Steve Goldfinger, Diana Deumling, Michael Murray. 2005
254 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/91bb1ea1caaf0236ff724920656bbd7204dd2e4a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Arjen Y. Hoekstra
- R. Siche
- K. Turner
- I. Acosta-Alba
- Lucas Pereira
- H. V. D. Werf
- Victor Nolet
- Feni Agostinho
Citations in the corpus
- An exploration of the mathematics behind the ecological footprint (2008, methodology): “Therefore, the use of an area as a measure of life supporting natural capital was chosen to refl ect the fact that many basic ecosystem services and ecological resources are provided by surfaces where photosynthesis takes place [11].”
- Examining the global environmental impact of regional consumption activities — Part 2: Review of input–output models for the assessment of environmental impacts embodied in trade (2007, methodology): “The latter features are not possible with the current method used to compile the National Footprint Accounts (Wackernagel et al., 2005).”
- Human appropriation of natural capital: A comparison of ecological footprint and water footprint analysis (2009, methodology): “In EF analysis two alternative calculation methods can be used: the so-called component-based calculation and the compound calculation (Simmons et al., 2000; Chambers et al., 2000 p.67–69; Wackernagel et al., 2005, p.5).”
- The Use of Reference Values in Indicator-Based Methods for the Environmental Assessment of Agricultural Systems (2011, methodology): “This method has been updated several times and applied largely at national levels [20-25].”
- Preparing Sustainability-Literate Teachers (2009, background): “Indeed, if the rest of the world’s inhabitants consumed resources at the rate of North Americans alone, it would take 2.5 Earths to support us all (Wackernagel et al., 2005; World Wildlife Fund for Nature, 2006).”
- Convergence of ecological footprint and emergy analysis as a sustainability indicator of countries: Peru as case study (2010, background): “ing on specific aspects, for instance emergy analysis [29], ecological footprint [57], material flow accounting [39], embodied energy analysis [46], exergy analysis [47], modified GDP’s, among others.”
- EXIOPOL – DEVELOPMENT AND ILLUSTRATIVE ANALYSES OF A DETAILED GLOBAL MR EE SUT/IOT (2013, unknown): “(3) A proxy of the EF (Wackernagel et al., 2005).”