Establishing national natural capital accounts based on detailed Ecological Footprint and biological capacity assessments

571 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Answers to common questions in Ecological Footprint accounting (2009, methodology): “Within a full Ecological Footprint calculation, data on carbon dioxide emissions are translated into the area, in global hectares, required to absorb these carbon emissions (Monfreda et al., 2004).”
Metrics for optimising the multi-dimensional value of resources recovered from waste in a circular economy: A critical review (2017, methodology): “A description of these metrics can be found in Supplementary Material.”
Human appropriation of natural capital: A comparison of ecological footprint and water footprint analysis (2009, methodology): “Both EF and WF analysis use actual technological practice when taking data on productivities ( Monfreda et al., 2004; Hoekstra and Chapagain, 2008).”
Theoretical exploration for the combination of the ecological, energy, carbon, and water footprints: Overview of a footprint family (2014, methodology): “It was originally defined as a measure of the amount of ecologically productive land and water required to supply a specific activity with resources consumed and carbon dioxide (CO2) generated (Monfreda et al., 2004; Wackernagel and Rees, 1996).”