Classification of ecosystem services: Problems and solutions

By Ken Wallace. 2007

1,076 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6f067d4241c3157f91c4650a7c7de756c833d940

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Citations in the corpus

The economics of desertification, land degradation, and drought: Toward an integrated global assessment (2011, neutral): “The concept of ecosystem services, however, is not perfectly suitable for framing the economic valuation of land resources, as pointed out by various studies (Boyd and Banzhaf 2007; Wallace 2007; Fisher, Turner, and Morling 2009).”
Human perturbations reduce dung beetle diversity and dung removal ecosystem function (2021, background): “…the ecosystem (Turner et al., 2000), and ecosystem services are the benefits that human populations obtain, directly and indirectly, from ecosystems (Boyd & Banzhaf, 2007; Costanza et al., 1997, 2017; Díaz et al., 2018; Lamarque et al., 2011; Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005; Wallace, 2007).”
Ecosystem services research in China: Progress and perspective (2010, background): “Therefore, the classification of ecosystem services is one of the most vigorous debate issues (de Groot et al., 2002; Wallace, 2007; Fisher et al., 2009).”
Win-win REDD+ approaches belie carbon-biodiversity trade-offs (2012, background): “While the need for ecosystem service valuation for natural resource decision-making is well known (Wallace, 2007), their quantification at any scale remains challenging (Naidoo et al., 2008; Daily et al., 2009), and relies on the availability of multiple accurate datasets (e.g., Troy and Wilson,…”
Australia's Biodiversity and Climate Change (2010, background): “Understanding and categorising ecosystem services also aids in making decisions about management priorities (Wallace 2007).”
Problematizing REDD+ as an experiment in payments for ecosystem services (2012, background): “The concept was already coined in the late 1970s and early 1980s but its utilitarian emphasis has been only recently discussed and criticized [23–25].”
Ecosystem services (2011, neutral): “Wallace KJ (2007) Classification of ecosystem services:”
Research, part of a Special Feature on Sustaining Ecosystem Services in Cultural Landscapes: Analysis and Management Options A Classification of Landscape Services to Support Local Landscape Planning (2014, background): “[online] URL: http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/ EN/Treaties/Html/199.htm Daily, G. C., editor.”
Soil “Ecosystem” Services and Natural Capital: Critical Appraisal of Research on Uncertain Ground (2016, background): “The same year, Schlichting (1972) introduced the concept of multi-functionality of soils and described how the buffering capacity of soils in different respects is important to a multitude of organisms and to other parts of the landscape.”
From theoretical to actual ecosystem services: mapping beneficiaries and spatial flows in ecosystem service assessments (2014, background): “…(Eigenbrod et al. 2010), recent work has sought to explicitly link ecological processes to specific human beneficiaries (Boyd and Banzhaf 2007, Wallace 2007, Haines-Young and Potschin 2011, Nahlik et al. 2012) and to more rigorously model and map ecosystem services (Kareiva et al. 2011, Egoh…”
The Concept of Ecosystem Services Regarding Landscape Research: A Review (2011, background): “According to Wallace (2007), most of the proposed classification systems confuse ends with means.”
Natural Capital, Ecosystem Services, and Soil Change: Why Soil Science Must Embrace an Ecosystems Approach (2012, background): “…ned, showing that the literature has no commonly accepted consistent dei nition. h is is something that they, and others (Boyd and Banzhaf, 2007; Wallace, 2007), argued is required to turn a conceptual framework into an operational system of accounting. h is represents a challenge for soil…”