Multiple Realities of Women’s Work Experiences in Coaching and Athletic Management

By S. Inglis, K. Danylchuk, D. Pastore. 2000

107 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Gender Studies, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4c0fdd8fcce4a4e041a8b9fb1ee29792447e03e0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. J. Bruening
2. M. Dixon
3. N. LaVoi

In Gender Studies

1. N. LaVoi
2. Julia K. Dutove
3. J. Bruening
4. M. Dixon

In Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

1. Julia K. Dutove
2. N. LaVoi
3. J. Bruening
4. M. Dixon

Citations in the corpus

• Bargaining With Patriarchy (2010, background): “Furthermore, the previous studies that addressed coaches’ gendered expe- riences (Inglis et al., 2000; Theberge, 1993; Thorngren, 1990) used interviews of small numbers of former and current coaches and athletic directors from the U.S. and Canada.”
• Work-Family Conflict in Coaching I: A Top-Down Perspective (2007, background): “” Here, very clearly, and in line with Dixon and Bruening’s (2005) model and previous research (Dodds 2003; Inglis et al., 2000; McKay et al., 2000), a sociocultural factor played a large role in shaping the structure and expectations of the workplace.”
• Barriers and supports for female coaches: an ecological model (2012, background): “, 1991), participatory decision making (Inglis et al., 2000), and mentoring opportunities (Inglis et al.”
• “Think Athletic Director, Think Masculine?”: Examination of the Gender Typing of Managerial Subroles Within Athletic Administration Positions (2009, unknown): “, football, basketball) (Inglis et al. 2000).”