Learning through feedback

By R. Houten. 1980

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Statistical Learning Theory

Citations in the corpus

Dialog-based Language Learning (2016, background): “Support for the usefulness of feedback is found however in second language learning [1] and learning by students [6, 11, 27].”
Providing Immediate Feedback to Co-Teachers Through Bug-in-Ear Technology: An Effective Method of Peer Coaching in Inclusion Classrooms (2010, background): “The more opportunities that students have to respond and the more frequently feedback is provided, the more student learning takes place (Albers & Greer, 1991; Van Houten, 1980).”
Providing Performance Feedback to Teachers: A Review (2004, background): “…corrective feedback (i.e., feedback that identifies the type and extent of errors, and provides specific ways to correct them) is purported to be one of the most useful tools for eradicating perseverative or well-learned errors because it demonstrates correct responses (Van Houten, 1980).”
The effect of peer feedback for blogging on college students' reflective learning processes (2008, background): “Latham (1997) expressed a fundamental concern about peer feedback because he was doubtful whether peers were able to offer the same high-quality feedback that teachers can. According to Vygotsky's (1978) theory of “zone of proximal development”, students can benefit from interacting with more capabl”
Under Review as a Conference Paper at Iclr 2017 Learning through Dialogue Interactions (2016, background): “In a broader context, the usefulness of feedback and interactions has been validated in the setting of multiple language learning, such as second language learning (Bassiri, 2011) and learning by students (Higgins et al., 2002; Latham, 1997; Werts et al., 1995).”