Information systems and ecological sustainability

By Adela J. Chen, Marie-Claude Boudreau, Richard Thomas Watson. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 2008

420 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Marketing, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4bc97e80dc0b74a50fe4106399fe9477d292c192

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

1. Steve Elliot
2. Roya Gholami
3. Jie Shen
4. Hongru Zhang

In Marketing

1. Nripendra P. Rana
2. Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi
3. Abdullah Mohammed Baabdullah
4. Thurasamy Ramayah
5. Steve Elliot
6. Thompson S. H. Teo
7. Robert M. Davison
8. Ioanna D. Constantiou

In Strategy and Management

1. Ainin Sulaiman
2. Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi
3. Suprateek Sarker
4. Steve Elliot
5. Frantz Rowe
6. Nripendra P. Rana
7. Maung Kyaw Sein
8. A. Molla

Citations in the corpus

• Senior managers' perception on green information systems (IS) adoption and environmental performance: Results from a field survey (2013, background): “On the other hand, the second-order effect involves the positive impact of using IS to improve the eco-sustainability of businesses and society; this is termed Green IS [6].”
• Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Environmental Sustainability: A Resource Base and Framework for IT-Enabled Business Transformation (2011, background): “Theories/Models Category Discipline Citation Balanced score card (Kaplan and Norton 1992) Organizational Ecology/Env Figge et al. 2002 Catalytic innovation model for social-sector organizations Societal Management Christensen et al. 2006 Championing Individuals and Groups Management Andersson and Ba”
• Climate change and COP26: Are digital technologies and information management part of the problem or the solution? An editorial reflection and call to action (2022, background): “These impacts can be linked to technologies and IS that do not suitably consider socio-ecological and socio-technical considerations, and that fail to recognize the value of design, testing and validation, with sustainability and people in mind (Chen, Boudreau, & Watson, 2008; Trist, 1981).”